public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kent Borg <kentborg@borg.org>
To: Michael Rothwell <rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Something Broken in 2.4.9-ac15
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:20:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010925112012.C27059@borg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1001377785.1430.7.camel@gromit.house>
In-Reply-To: <1001377785.1430.7.camel@gromit.house>; from rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:29:44PM -0400

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:29:44PM -0400, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> my swap load is at zero, which is probably where it should be (2.4.7
> would regularly be using 256MB of swap with the same applications
> running).

That got my attention.  I think something is broken here and you
are into swap but the reporting is quite wrong.

I have 192 MB in my laptop running 2.4.9-ac15 w/preemption patch
turned on.  I fired up a couple Mozilla windows, a couple Netscape
windows, Staroffice, a couple acroread windows, a couple emacs
windows, Abiword, and I forget what all.  Still no swap usage
reported.  I fired up a second X session and my computer came to a
crawl as it tried to run all those apps again.  The disk was grinding
away--it felt just like a swapping death and yet xosview and top both
reported 0 swap usage.  I don't believe it was so.

I killed most everything, and now the computer feels like it is back
to normal, but xosview thinks the CPU is pinned at 100% SYS when
nothing is going on.  I drag a window around and I get plenty of USR
and even some FREE, but let go and it goes back to 100%.

Something is broken here, me thinks.


-kb, the Kent who might go back to 2.4.9-ac12 later today and ry it
again.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-25 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-25  0:29 2.4.10 much better than previous 2.4.x :-) Michael Rothwell
2001-09-25  1:35 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-26  0:35   ` Paul
2001-09-26 20:08     ` José Luis Domingo López
2001-09-27  8:17       ` Helge Hafting
2001-09-28  4:53     ` Paul
2001-09-25 15:20 ` Kent Borg [this message]
2001-09-25 16:51   ` Something Broken in 2.4.9-ac15 Kent Borg
2001-09-26  0:06 ` 2.4.10 much better than previous 2.4.x :-) Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010925112012.C27059@borg.org \
    --to=kentborg@borg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox