From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 04:07:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 04:07:00 -0400 Received: from pa147.antoniuk.sdi.tpnet.pl ([213.25.59.147]:8322 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 04:06:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:05:02 +0200 From: Jacek =?iso-8859-2?Q?Pop=B3awski?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bad, bad, bad VM behaviour in 2.4.10 Message-ID: <20010926100502.A2824@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <3BB0F483.69929A79@ditec.um.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: ; from marcelo@conectiva.com.br on Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 05:03:35PM -0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 05:03:35PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > I need some information which may help confirm a guess of mine: > > Do you have swap available ? > > If so, there was available anonymous memory to be swapped out ? As I wrote before - on my system this problem appear even when swap is on, and there is enough swap, but not enought RAM (i.e. when system just starts using swap...).