public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tools better than vmstat [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?]
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 14:53:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010928145324.A14801@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200109281826.f8SIQLP06585@deathstar.prodigy.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109281535220.26495-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> <20010928123455.B8222@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <20010928210453.B15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20010928210453.B15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 09:04:53PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 12:34:55PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > I read not too long ago about someone mentioning a patch that lists the ages
> > of pages via a proc interface...
> 
> I have a patch that dumps out all sorts of information on sysrq-g and
> sysrq-h, including page ages as you describe above.  Rik has this patch,
> but you really do need a serial console and not a lot of RAM to use it
> (or a lot of patience).
> 

Hmm.

Ok, can someone tell me how many different ages there can be in the VM?  

I'm thinkin of a tool (vm-page-stat?) that will list the percentage of pages
at a specific (or if there are more than ~10 page ages possible, it could
use ranges...) age much like vmstat does now.

Is there any possibility of using Russell's patch for this user space tool?
Maybe Russel's patch could have a proc interface that vm-page-stat would
read to get a snapshot?

It would certainly be more helpful than vmstat alone...

Comments?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-28 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-28  3:17 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Thomas Hood
2001-09-28  3:50 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 18:26   ` bill davidsen
2001-09-28 18:36     ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 19:14       ` Pau Aliagas
2001-09-28 22:20         ` Alan Cox
2001-09-28 19:34       ` Tools better than vmstat [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?] Mike Fedyk
     [not found]         ` <20010928210453.B15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2001-09-28 21:53           ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-09-28 22:00             ` Russell King
2001-09-28 22:33               ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-28 23:00                 ` Russell King
2001-09-29  0:18                   ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-29  1:08   ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Mike Fedyk
2001-09-29  1:20     ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-29  1:25       ` [Kinda-OT] Reinventing wheels [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?] Mike Fedyk
2001-10-01 11:14       ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Daniel Phillips
2001-10-01 13:57         ` Load control (was: Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?) Rik van Riel
2001-10-01 16:05           ` Daniel Phillips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010928145324.A14801@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
    --to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox