From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 18:08:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010928180819.A29756@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BB3EBC1.DE9AA505@yahoo.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109280049380.19147-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109280049380.19147-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 12:50:21AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> > Either 2.4.9-ac16 has much improved VM performance over
> > previous 2.4 kernels (under moderate load, at least), or someone
> > sneaked in to my apartment last night and upgraded my machine
> > while I was asleep. I'm leaning toward the latter explanation.
>
> Now that the -ac VM was stable for a few weeks, I thought
> it might be time to sneak in some big performance changes,
> finally.
>
> They seem to work ;)
>
Is it normal to have Inact_target 1/4 of main memory (64MB of 256MB RAM)?
In previous versions, this value would fluctuate with the load of the system.
Is this expected?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-29 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-28 3:17 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Thomas Hood
2001-09-28 3:50 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 18:26 ` bill davidsen
2001-09-28 18:36 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 19:14 ` Pau Aliagas
2001-09-28 22:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-28 19:34 ` Tools better than vmstat [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?] Mike Fedyk
[not found] ` <20010928210453.B15457@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2001-09-28 21:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-28 22:00 ` Russell King
2001-09-28 22:33 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-28 23:00 ` Russell King
2001-09-29 0:18 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-29 1:08 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-09-29 1:20 ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Rik van Riel
2001-09-29 1:25 ` [Kinda-OT] Reinventing wheels [was: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?] Mike Fedyk
2001-10-01 11:14 ` 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer? Daniel Phillips
2001-10-01 13:57 ` Load control (was: Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?) Rik van Riel
2001-10-01 16:05 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010928180819.A29756@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox