From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
bcrl@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10.
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:31:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010928193147.R24922@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200109281704.VAA04444@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109281420180.26495-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109281420180.26495-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>; from riel@conectiva.com.br on Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:21:07PM -0300
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:21:07PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Then how would you explain the 10% speed difference
> Ben and others have seen with gigabit ethernet ?
partly because of the unwakeup logic, I've no problem with it, this is
why I asked to measure how much of the 10% improvement cames from the
unwakeup/ksoftirqd-deschedule logic, I was just curious about that.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-28 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-26 16:44 [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-26 17:48 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-09-26 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-26 18:55 ` Russell King
2001-09-26 19:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-27 23:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 3:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 15:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 7:18 ` [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B2 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 15:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 18:36 ` Simon Kirby
2001-09-28 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:31 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 16:18 ` [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 kuznet
2001-09-28 16:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 17:04 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 17:21 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 17:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-09-28 17:41 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 17:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 18:39 ` Josh MacDonald
2001-09-28 17:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 17:56 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:23 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 19:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-29 16:35 ` kuznet
2001-09-30 9:37 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-09-30 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:39 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 20:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 18:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-28 16:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 16:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 16:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 16:35 ` [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B3 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-29 0:40 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-09-29 11:03 ` [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 Rusty Russell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-27 23:29 Oleg Nesterov
2001-09-28 0:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 6:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 2:50 Oleg Nesterov
2001-09-28 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010928193147.R24922@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox