From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
bcrl@redhat.com, andrea@suse.de
Subject: Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10.
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 21:03:06 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010929210306.7904954e.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200109281618.UAA04122@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109261729570.5644-200000@localhost.localdomain> <200109281618.UAA04122@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:18:20 +0400 (MSK DST)
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> Also, you did not assure me that you interpret problem correctly.
> netif_rx() is __insensitive__ to latencies due to blocked softirq
restarts.
> It stops spinning only when it becomes true cpu hog. And scheduling
ksoftirqd
> is the only variant here.
Hi Ingo at al,
Attached is the approach I sent to l-k earlier this week: if a timer tick
goes off, back off to ksoftirqd.
This should, statistically, do the right thing, even in the case of smart
softirqs like netif_rx.
Please consider,
Rusty.
--- linux-pmac/kernel/softirq.c Sun Sep 9 15:11:37 2001
+++ working-pmac-ksoftirq/kernel/softirq.c Mon Sep 24 09:44:07 2001
@@ -63,11 +63,12 @@
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
__u32 pending;
long flags;
- __u32 mask;
+ long start;
if (in_interrupt())
return;
+ start = jiffies;
local_irq_save(flags);
pending = softirq_pending(cpu);
@@ -75,32 +76,32 @@
if (pending) {
struct softirq_action *h;
- mask = ~pending;
local_bh_disable();
-restart:
- /* Reset the pending bitmask before enabling irqs */
- softirq_pending(cpu) = 0;
+ do {
+ /* Reset the pending bitmask before enabling irqs */
+ softirq_pending(cpu) = 0;
- local_irq_enable();
+ local_irq_enable();
- h = softirq_vec;
+ h = softirq_vec;
- do {
- if (pending & 1)
- h->action(h);
- h++;
- pending >>= 1;
- } while (pending);
-
- local_irq_disable();
-
- pending = softirq_pending(cpu);
- if (pending & mask) {
- mask &= ~pending;
- goto restart;
- }
+ do {
+ if (pending & 1)
+ h->action(h);
+ h++;
+ pending >>= 1;
+ } while (pending);
+
+ local_irq_disable();
+
+ pending = softirq_pending(cpu);
+
+ /* Don't spin here forever... */
+ } while (pending && start == jiffies);
__local_bh_enable();
+ /* If a timer tick went off, assume we're overloaded,
+ and kick in ksoftirqd */
if (pending)
wakeup_softirqd(cpu);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-30 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-26 16:44 [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-26 17:48 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-09-26 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-26 18:55 ` Russell King
2001-09-26 19:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-27 23:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 3:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 15:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 7:18 ` [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B2 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 15:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 18:36 ` Simon Kirby
2001-09-28 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:31 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 16:18 ` [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 kuznet
2001-09-28 16:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 17:04 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 17:21 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 17:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 17:41 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 17:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 18:39 ` Josh MacDonald
2001-09-28 17:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 17:56 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:23 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 19:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-29 16:35 ` kuznet
2001-09-30 9:37 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-09-30 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 19:39 ` kuznet
2001-09-28 20:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 18:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-28 16:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 16:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 16:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 16:35 ` [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B3 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-29 0:40 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-09-29 11:03 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-27 23:29 [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10 Oleg Nesterov
2001-09-28 0:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-09-28 6:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-28 2:50 Oleg Nesterov
2001-09-28 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010929210306.7904954e.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox