From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 17:47:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 17:46:43 -0400 Received: from femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.0.95.89]:17593 "EHLO femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 17:46:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 17:50:53 -0400 From: Tom Vier To: Wolly Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Huge disk performance degradation STILL IN 2.4.10 Message-ID: <20010930175053.A15091@zero> In-Reply-To: <200109211723.TAA00638@enigma.deepspace.net> <200109241505.RAA12224@enigma.deepspace.net> <1001344775.069479.26256.nullmailer@bozar.algorithm.com.au> <200109251000.MAA00463@enigma.deepspace.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200109251000.MAA00463@enigma.deepspace.net>; from wwolly@gmx.net on Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:00:00PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org i noticed it in 2.4.7-ac3 -> ac4, iirc. On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:00:00PM +0200, Wolly wrote: > Okay, as just a few people on the list seem to worry about the issue, > I spent an hour online and downloaded kernel 2.4.6 + patches for > 2.4.[789] again to see exactly where the problem begins. -- Tom Vier DSA Key id 0x27371A2C