public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>
To: "M. Edward Borasky" <znmeb@aracnet.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 21:29:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010930212937.A7897@cs.cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BB7918E.E74A3BE4@pobox.com> <HBEHIIBBKKNOBLMPKCBBEEOFDNAA.znmeb@aracnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <HBEHIIBBKKNOBLMPKCBBEEOFDNAA.znmeb@aracnet.com>

On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 03:40:27PM -0700, M. Edward Borasky wrote:
> Here, for your amusement, is a snippet of Perl code:
> 
> $stuff = `uname`;
> if ($stuff =~ /is not recognized as an internal or external command,/ {
> 	# execute malicious Windows code
> }
> else {
> 	# look at the uname stuff and figure out what OS we're running
> 	# then execute OS-specific malicious code
> }
> 
> Do you see what I'm saying?

You run untrusted snippets of perl-code as root?

To return to your original argument,

If a company sells me a car that has a rust-proof guarantee under the
conditions that I keep it garaged 24/7 (similar to the Windows NT C2
rating). And when I take it for a spin someone sprays it with a garden
hose. The car falls apart from the rust. Do I have the right to lock
_any guy with a garden hose_ up in prison because they could cause
irrepairable damage to cars? Or maybe that car shouldn't have left the
factory in the first place.

Any further discussion can go to /dev/null.

Jan


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-10-01  1:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-24 23:22 [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Paul G. Allen
2001-09-24 23:35 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-25  0:34   ` Michael Rothwell
2001-09-25  0:40     ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-27 14:21       ` Pavel Machek
2001-09-26 11:48   ` Luigi Genoni
2001-09-26 12:15     ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by lifein prison Eugenio Mastroviti
2001-09-24 23:37 ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Rik van Riel
2001-09-25  1:29   ` Jeff V. Merkey
2001-09-25  0:44     ` Crutcher Dunnavant
2001-09-25  0:52       ` David S. Miller
2001-09-25  1:32     ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-27 14:23     ` Pavel Machek
2001-09-30 21:16       ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-09-30 21:41         ` J Sloan
2001-09-30 22:40           ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-09-30 23:12             ` J Sloan
2001-10-01  1:15             ` Gerhard Mack
2001-10-01  1:29             ` Jan Harkes [this message]
2001-09-30 22:03         ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-30 23:24           ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by lifein prison D. Stimits
2001-10-01  0:17             ` Michael Bacarella
2001-10-01  0:33               ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-10-01  1:26               ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-10-01  9:20           ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-09-30 22:57         ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison John Gluck
2001-09-30 23:32           ` D. Stimits
2001-10-01  8:47         ` Helge Hafting
2001-10-01 10:41           ` Manfred Bartz
2001-10-01 12:27             ` John Jasen
2001-10-01 12:54               ` Ookhoi
2001-10-01 11:47           ` [Moving rapidly away from LKM] (Was: Re: [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in) Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-10-01 13:12             ` Helge Hafting
2001-10-01  9:28         ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Bernd Petrovitsch
2001-10-01 12:00         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-02  9:40         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-09-25 11:04   ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-09-27 14:18 ` [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-25 11:17 Nicholas Berry
2001-09-27  0:45 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2005-07-02  0:07 jmerkey
2005-07-02  0:59 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-02  1:43   ` jmerkey
2005-07-02  3:53     ` randy_dunlap
2005-07-02 13:26     ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-02 14:58       ` jmerkey
2005-07-02  2:39   ` Paul Jakma
2005-07-02  2:13     ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-02 13:15 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-02 15:46 ` Kurt Wall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010930212937.A7897@cs.cmu.edu \
    --to=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=/dev/null@mentor.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=znmeb@aracnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox