From: Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@balabit.hu>
To: Mark Hahn <hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reproducible bug in 2.2.19 & 2.4.x
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:03:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011001120325.A7473@balabit.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010928203019.A24999@balabit.hu> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10109281515050.6506-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10109281515050.6506-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>; from hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca on Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 03:15:32PM -0400
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 921 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 03:15:32PM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
>
> seems like an interaction between your signal code and pthread,
> no obvious reason to blame the kernel:
I've updated my test program to address your issues:
1) I removed the SIGSEGV handler (you know with the fprintf())
2) I modified it to use separate memory for all thread initialization data
The segfault still occurs. (to reenable backtrace #define BACKTRACE to 1 at
the beginning of the program) core is not dumped, because threaded programs
do not drop core.
I still think it's a kernel issue, at least the SMP dependancy tells me so.
(remember SMP kernel on an UP is affected too)
I also attach the strace of the process, which also shows the segfault. (it
is made by strace 4.4 which can follow threads)
PS: again please Cc me, since I'm not subscribed.
--
Bazsi
PGP info: KeyID 9AF8D0A9 Fingerprint CD27 CFB0 802C 0944 9CFD 804E C82C 8EB1
[-- Attachment #2: stressthreads.c --]
[-- Type: text/x-csrc, Size: 2279 bytes --]
#include <pthread.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <syslog.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define BACKTRACE 0
#if BACKTRACE
void inline
z_dump_backtrace(unsigned long eip, unsigned long first_ebp)
{
/* NOTE: this is i386 specific */
unsigned long *ebp;
fprintf(stderr, "retaddr=0x%lx, ebp=0x%lx\n", eip, first_ebp);
ebp = (unsigned long *) first_ebp;
while (ebp > (unsigned long *) &ebp && *ebp)
{
fprintf(stderr, "retaddr=0x%lx, ebp=0x%lx\n", *(ebp+1), *ebp);
ebp = (unsigned long *) *ebp;
}
}
void
z_fatal_signal_handler(int signo)
{
struct sigcontext *p = (struct sigcontext *) (((char *) &p) + 16);
fprintf(stderr, "Signal (%d) received, stackdump follows; eax='%08lx', ebx='%08lx', ecx='%08lx', edx='%08lx', eip='%08lx'\n",
signo, p->eax, p->ebx, p->ecx, p->edx, p->eip);
z_dump_backtrace(p->eip, p->ebp);
exit(1);
}
#endif
void *thread_func(void *arg)
{
int fd = *(int *) arg;
int i;
char buf[1024];
syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "thread started...%p\n", pthread_self());
memset(buf, 'a', sizeof(buf));
for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
{
write(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
}
close(fd);
//syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "thread stopped...%p\n", pthread_self());
free(arg);
return NULL;
}
int main()
{
int fd;
struct sockaddr_in sin;
int tmp = 1;
#if BACKTRACE
signal(SIGSEGV, z_fatal_signal_handler);
#endif
signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
fd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
sin.sin_family = AF_INET;
sin.sin_port = htons(10000);
sin.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;
setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &tmp, sizeof(tmp));
if (bind(fd, (struct sockaddr *) &sin, sizeof(sin)) < 0)
{
perror("bind");
return 0;
}
listen(fd, 255);
while (1)
{
int newfd;
int tmplen;
pthread_t t;
tmplen = sizeof(sin);
newfd = accept(fd, (struct sockaddr *) &sin, &tmplen);
if (newfd == -1)
{
perror("accept");
}
else
{
int *state = (int *) malloc(sizeof(int));
*state = newfd;
pthread_create(&t, NULL, thread_func, state);
}
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-01 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-28 11:01 reproducible bug in 2.2.19 & 2.4.x Balazs Scheidler
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.10.10109281121590.6506-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-09-28 18:30 ` Balazs Scheidler
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.10.10109281515050.6506-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-09-28 22:12 ` Balazs Scheidler
2001-10-01 10:03 ` Balazs Scheidler [this message]
2001-10-02 8:31 ` Balazs Scheidler
[not found] ` <20011003125319.A32248@sci41.imag.fr>
2001-10-03 11:41 ` reproducible bug in 2.2.19 & 2.4.x [lkml] Balazs Scheidler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-28 11:38 reproducible bug in 2.2.19 & 2.4.x Rainer Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011001120325.A7473@balabit.hu \
--to=bazsi@balabit.hu \
--cc=hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox