From: Crutcher Dunnavant <crutcher@datastacks.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stateful Magic Sysrq Key
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 10:18:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011002101845.A1630@mueller.datastacks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011002084807.3579.qmail@web20505.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011002084807.3579.qmail@web20505.mail.yahoo.com>; from wtarreau@yahoo.fr on Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:48:06AM +0200
++ 02/10/01 10:48 +0200 - willy tarreau:
> > I'd suggest either making this behaviour optional,
> or making it
> > so that hitting alt-sysrq twice, without any other
> keys being
> > pressed makes the next key stick.
>
> I agree with you that there's a risk. Mike Harris had
> written a
> patch for 2.2 which did something similar, but
> slightly better
> IMO since it avoids risks of mis-press, handles
> correctly
> broken keyboards and keeps compatible with the
> existing
> method. Basically, it allows the user to press Alt,
> then SysRQ,
> release SysRQ then press the desired key, and later
> release
> Alt. In fact, it only resets the "magic-key-mode" flag
> after Alt
> has been released, and doesn't bother when SysRq is
> released.
But this would require that alt be pressed. This is not acceptable on
exactly the sort of boards which require this patch.
I will look at adding a 'sysrq-sticky' entry to proc, which will do the
obvious thing. I think that this should address everyone's concerns.
--
Crutcher <crutcher@datastacks.com>
GCS d--- s+:>+:- a-- C++++$ UL++++$ L+++$>++++ !E PS+++ PE Y+ PGP+>++++
R-(+++) !tv(+++) b+(++++) G+ e>++++ h+>++ r* y+>*$
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-02 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 8:48 [PATCH] Stateful Magic Sysrq Key willy tarreau
2001-10-02 14:18 ` Crutcher Dunnavant [this message]
2001-10-03 14:05 ` [PATCH] Stateful Magic Sysrq Key + Sticky Tag Crutcher Dunnavant
[not found] <20011002185016.90E271F9BA@zion.rivenstone.net>
2001-10-03 4:23 ` [PATCH] Stateful Magic Sysrq Key Ian Stirling
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-02 3:44 Crutcher Dunnavant
2001-10-02 4:14 ` Simon Kirby
2001-10-02 7:02 ` Ian Stirling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011002101845.A1630@mueller.datastacks.com \
--to=crutcher@datastacks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox