public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Crutcher Dunnavant <crutcher@datastacks.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: printk while interrupts are disabled
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 10:22:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011002102210.B1630@mueller.datastacks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BB9A6F4.6BDDAA81@berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <3BB9A6F4.6BDDAA81@berlin.de>; from n.roos@berlin.de on Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 01:37:24PM +0200

++ 02/10/01 13:37 +0200 - Norbert Roos:
> Hello!
> 
> Simple question: Do printk()s get printed while interrupts are disabled
> (after cli)?

They get stuffed into a buffer to be printed later. It is possible to
overflow that buffer, and lose some of your printk messages.

from krenel/printk.c:
/*
 * This is printk.  It can be called from any context.  We want it to
 * work.
 * 
 * We try to grab the console_sem.  If we succeed, it's easy - we log
 * the output and
 * call the console drivers.  If we fail to get the semaphore we place
 * the output
 * into the log buffer and return.  The current holder of the
 * console_sem will
 * notice the new output in release_console_sem() and will send it to
 * the
 * consoles before releasing the semaphore.
 *
 * One effect of this deferred printing is that code which calls
 * printk() and
 * then changes console_loglevel may break. This is because
 * console_loglevel
 * is inspected when the actual printing occurs.
 */
...
        /* This stops the holder of console_sem just where we want him
 * */
        spin_lock_irqsave(&logbuf_lock, flags);



-- 
Crutcher        <crutcher@datastacks.com>
GCS d--- s+:>+:- a-- C++++$ UL++++$ L+++$>++++ !E PS+++ PE Y+ PGP+>++++
    R-(+++) !tv(+++) b+(++++) G+ e>++++ h+>++ r* y+>*$

  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-02 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-02 11:37 printk while interrupts are disabled Norbert Roos
2001-10-02 14:22 ` Crutcher Dunnavant [this message]
2001-10-02 14:33   ` Tim Waugh
2001-10-02 17:09   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011002102210.B1630@mueller.datastacks.com \
    --to=crutcher@datastacks.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox