From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: partition table read incorrectly
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:08:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011002150820.N8954@turbolinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011002202934.G14582@wiggy.net> <E15oUUf-0005Xw-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20011002220053.H14582@wiggy.net>
In-Reply-To: <20011002220053.H14582@wiggy.net>
On Oct 02, 2001 22:00 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Alan Cox wrote:
> > Does it complain about wrong block sizes ?
>
> No
>
> > The partition code will look for tables. That bit is fine
>
> If that bit is fine then how can it differ in opinion from fdisk?
What does the first 512 bytes of the disk show (od -Ax -tx1 /dev/)?
Maybe there is still "0xaa55" on the disk at 0x1fe and the kernel
thinks it is a DOS partition?
> > The exact error would be good too
>
> I/O error: dev 08:11, sector 0
Hmm, this is sda11, so you would need both a primary and extended
partition table to get that. What does /proc/partitions show?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-02 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 18:29 partition table read incorrectly Wichert Akkerman
2001-10-02 18:42 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-02 20:00 ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-10-02 21:08 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2001-10-03 0:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-10-03 11:22 ` Guest section DW
2001-10-03 12:26 ` [linux-lvm] " Wichert Akkerman
2001-10-03 12:42 ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-10-03 13:24 ` Wichert Akkerman
2001-10-03 17:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-02 22:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-03 0:57 ` Wichert Akkerman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-03 16:21 Andries.Brouwer
2001-10-03 17:04 ` Charles Marslett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011002150820.N8954@turbolinux.com \
--to=adilger@turbolabs.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox