From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: law@sgi.com, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 'dd' local works, but not over net, help as to why?
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 13:22:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200110021722.f92HMmt29193@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1002009301.30795.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.1002009301.30795.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
> dd if=/dev/hda2 bs=1M|rsh other-system of=/dev/sda2 bs=1M
That does not work on all unixes. Perhaps it does on IRIX,
but certainly not on Solaris. The remote dd is going to
get short reads from the socket. The telltale sign is the
number to short records:
itcev@niphredil /boot]$ dd if=vmlinux-2.4.7-niph bs=8k | ssh pentabug dd of=xxx bs=8k
333+1 records in
333+1 records out
7+653 records in <------- almost all are shorts
7+653 records out
[zaitcev@niphredil /boot]$
There is no good way to deal with it, unless you use some external
filter (perhaps netcat?). tar has a flag -B to deal with this.
An oldtimer's trick is to use compress, which works because
zcat uses stdio for output and its blocksize is fixed.
[zaitcev@niphredil /boot]$ dd if=vmlinux-2.4.7-niph bs=8k | compress | ssh pentabug "zcat |dd of=xxx bs=8k"
333+1 records in
333+1 records out
333+1 records in
333+1 records out
[zaitcev@niphredil /boot]$
This behaviour of sockets on Linux is entirely normal, so deal with it.
My pet peeve is how DaveM insists that WRITES to a socket may return
short. That stupidity just makes me furious each time. A socket has
a posix-schmozix "right" to return short, I agree. But it is extremely
rude and in the right implementation, it should not. It breaks just
about _every_ application that uses printk.
-- Pete
next parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-02 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1002009301.30795.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2001-10-02 17:22 ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2001-10-02 18:18 ` 'dd' local works, but not over net, help as to why? L A Walsh
2001-10-02 7:52 LA Walsh
2001-10-02 8:20 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-10-02 8:35 ` LA Walsh
2001-10-02 8:53 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-10-02 9:21 ` Alistair Riddell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200110021722.f92HMmt29193@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
--cc=law@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox