From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: James Simmons <jsimmons@transvirtual.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux console project <linuxconsole-dev@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Huge console switching lags
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 12:19:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011003101944.29249@smtp.adsl.oleane.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15oYUA-0006HG-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E15oYUA-0006HG-00@the-village.bc.nu>
>> The software accel functions needed by the console layer (copyarea,
>> fillrect, and drawimage) have been already written. Okay the drawimage one
>> needs alot of work. I haven't benchmarked the new code versus the current
>
>On x86 they'll probably make no difference at all, unless the old code
>is really really crap. Your bottleneck is the PCI bus. All you can do is
>avoid reads.
Well, there are indeed a few improvements to get with machine specific
optimisations on unaccelerated framebuffer.
One example is, on PPC, the use of a floating point register to do the
blits 64 bits at a time. This allow the PCI host controller to generate
bursts of 2 32 bits transactions (for machines with controllers unable
to write combine). Of course, having such optimisations in the kernel
is tricky because of the lazy FPU switching (well, at least on PPC),
but the point is that improvement _is_ possible.
Regards,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-03 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 9:11 Huge console switching lags Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-10-02 16:57 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-02 17:12 ` James Simmons
2001-10-02 18:10 ` Ricky Beam
2001-10-02 18:22 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-02 18:24 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-02 18:32 ` Ricky Beam
2001-10-02 18:43 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-02 18:50 ` James Simmons
2001-10-02 22:39 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-02 22:50 ` James Simmons
2001-10-02 22:57 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-02 23:13 ` James Simmons
2001-10-03 10:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2001-10-03 16:58 ` James Simmons
2001-10-03 17:27 ` Paul Mundt
2001-10-04 7:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-10-04 16:49 ` James Simmons
2001-10-02 18:56 ` Chris Wedgwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011003101944.29249@smtp.adsl.oleane.com \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jsimmons@transvirtual.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxconsole-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox