From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Subject: Re: kswapd problems with 2.4.{9,10}
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 04:07:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011009040753.I726@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011009015922.B6F9D1E544@Cantor.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20011009015922.B6F9D1E544@Cantor.suse.de>; from Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de on Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 03:59:16AM +0200
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 03:59:16AM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> Hallo Andrea,
>
> could this mlock related, too?
> latencytest0.42-png
>
> SunWave1>./latencytest
> mlockall() failed, exiting. mlock: Operation not permitted
>
> SunWave1>su
> Password:
>
> SunWave1#unlimit coredumpsize
> SunWave1#./latencytest
> Speicherschutzverletzung (core dumped)
>
> Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4
> Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> #0 0x8048f91 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff344) at latencytest.c:233
> 233 if(strcmp(argv[1],"none"))
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x8048f91 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff344) at latencytest.c:233
> #1 0x400c1baf in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
> (gdb) info registers
> eax 0x0 0
> ecx 0x5 5
> edx 0xf7f 3967
> ebx 0x1 1
> esp 0xbffff224 0xbffff224
> ebp 0xbffff2dc 0xbffff2dc
> esi 0x0 0
> edi 0x804a761 134522721
> eip 0x8048f91 0x8048f91
> eflags 0x10246 66118
> cs 0x23 35
> ss 0x2b 43
> ds 0x2b 43
> es 0x2b 43
> fs 0x2b 43
> gs 0x2b 43
> fctrl 0x37f 895
> fstat 0x0 0
> ftag 0x0 0
> fiseg 0x0 0
> fioff 0x0 0
> foseg 0x0 0
> fooff 0x0 0
> fop 0x0 0
>
> It worked with 2.4.10 (-preX) and 2.4.11-pre1 (I think).
> But _NOT_ with 2.4.11-pre2+ (2.4.11-pre5 + preempt :-) currently.
Are you sure you simply didn't forgot to pass argv[1]? :)
mlockall is somehow simpler than a partial mlocks on a large vma,
mlockall doesn't need to split off the partial vmas, I was only
wondering about the other splitting path stressed by Ben's testcase.
Also there aren't been recent changes there.
>
> Do you need the coredump file?
>
> Thanks,
> Dieter
Andrea
next parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20011009015922.B6F9D1E544@Cantor.suse.de>
2001-10-09 2:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-10-09 1:59 kswapd problems with 2.4.{9,10} Dieter Nützel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-05 18:21 Ben Smith
2001-10-09 0:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011009040753.I726@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox