public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: balbir.singh@wipro.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 12:36:03 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011010123603.A17043@in.ibm.com> (raw)


In article <3BC3D9ED.6050901@wipro.com> BALBIR SINGH wrote:

> What about cases like the pci device list or any other such list. Sometimes
> you do not care if somebody added something, while you were looking through
> the list as long as you do not get illegal addresses or data.
> Wouldn't this be very useful there? Most of these lists come up
> at system startup and change rearly, but we look through them often.

How often does the linux kernel need to go through the PCI device
list ? Looking at only SCSI code, it seems that not very often.
If that is the case in general, optimizing it for lockless
lookup (assuming that you use RCU or something to support deletion),
is probably an overkill.

One example of where it is useful is maintenance of route information
in either storage or network. Route information changes infrequently but
needs to be looked up for every I/O and being able to do lockless
lookup here is a good gain.

Thanks
Dipankar
-- 
Dipankar Sarma  <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Project: http://lse.sourceforge.net
Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India.

             reply	other threads:[~2001-10-10  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-10  7:06 Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2001-10-10  7:21 ` [Lse-tech] Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion BALBIR SINGH
2001-10-10  9:06   ` Dipankar Sarma
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-13 14:42 Paul McKenney
2001-10-13 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-13 17:28   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-14  7:25     ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-13 18:42   ` Andi Kleen
2001-10-13 19:15     ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-13 20:44     ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-13 21:19   ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-11 10:34 Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-10 21:44 Paul McKenney
2001-10-10 16:00 Paul McKenney
2001-10-10 15:24 Paul McKenney
2001-10-10 16:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-10 17:25   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-12  5:06     ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-12 16:28       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-12 19:50         ` Al Dunsmuir
2001-10-13  1:07         ` Paul Mackerras
2001-10-13  1:54           ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-13  2:04             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-13  2:31               ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-13  2:46                 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-13  3:30                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-13  2:49               ` Paul Mackerras
2001-10-13  2:00           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-13  7:38         ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-10 10:06 Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-10 10:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-10 11:43   ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-12  3:27   ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-12 16:56     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-12 18:53       ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-13  7:25       ` Rusty Russell
     [not found] <20011010182730.0077454b.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2001-10-10  9:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-11  6:50   ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-10  7:58 Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-10  6:54 Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-10  4:43 Paul McKenney
2001-10-09 15:45 Paul McKenney
2001-10-10  2:05 ` [Lse-tech] " Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-10  5:05   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-10  5:17     ` BALBIR SINGH
2001-10-10  5:29       ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-10  5:46       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-10  6:01         ` BALBIR SINGH
2001-10-10 15:23           ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-10-10  6:16     ` Paul Mackerras
2001-10-10  6:30       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-10  7:36     ` Paul Mackerras
2001-10-10 15:54       ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-10-10 21:56         ` Keith Owens
2001-10-10 22:24           ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-10-10 23:46             ` David S. Miller
2001-10-11  0:24               ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-10 11:54     ` Keith Owens
2001-10-10 13:24   ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2001-10-10 13:41     ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011010123603.A17043@in.ibm.com \
    --to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=balbir.singh@wipro.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox