From: Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.11: mount flag noexec still broken for VFAT partition
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 04:04:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011011040424.A19996@l-t.ee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110102258290.28429-100000@gulbis.latnet.lv> <20011010151333.G10443@turbolinux.com> <20011011003609.B18573@l-t.ee> <9q2rhn$77i$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <9q2rhn$77i$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 06:10:15PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <20011011003609.B18573@l-t.ee>
> By author: Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > Um. 'noexec' does not touch flags, it only disallows exec'ing
> > on particular mountpoint.
> >
>
> It does on FAT filesystems (except UMSDOS), since they don't have real
> flags. Files and directories have syntesized attributes of
> (0777 & ~umask); noexec is supposed to modify that to (0666 & ~umask)
> for files but not directories.
>
> That has been the Linux behaviour since the 0.x days.
Eh. Seems my brain has managed to filter that out thus far.
Probably as "uninteresting" is the only thing I can say :)
What is interesting is that in current vfat I can toggle
+x bit on and off with chmod. So it seems like VFS does
not consult with fs anymore about bits. But you know
that already.
Oh well...
--
marko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-11 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-10 20:01 2.4.11: mount flag noexec still broken for VFAT partition Andris Pavenis
2001-10-10 21:13 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-10-10 22:36 ` Marko Kreen
2001-10-11 1:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-10-11 2:04 ` Marko Kreen [this message]
2001-10-11 2:07 ` [RFC] behaviour of stat() variants (was Re: 2.4.11: mount flag noexec still broken for VFAT partition) Alexander Viro
2001-10-11 6:09 ` 2.4.11: mount flag noexec still broken for VFAT partition Andris Pavenis
2001-10-11 8:14 ` linux-2.4.11-dontuse Why? Sergey S. Kostyliov
2001-10-11 10:12 ` Morten Helgesen
2001-10-11 19:18 ` 2.4.11: mount flag noexec still broken for VFAT partition Peter Bornemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011011040424.A19996@l-t.ee \
--to=marko@l-t.ee \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox