From: Ion Badulescu <ionut@cs.columbia.edu>
To: "Matthew S. Hallacy" <poptix@techmonkeys.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: eepro100.c bug on 10Mbit half duplex (kernels 2.4.5 / 2.4.10 / 2.4.11pre6 / 2.4.11 / 2.4.10ac11)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 16:08:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200110112008.f9BK8dP20700@buggy.badula.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011011114208.N11846@techmonkeys.org>
On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:42:08 -0600, Matthew S. Hallacy <poptix@techmonkeys.org> wrote:
> I currently have the equivalent of 8 of these in my system (Compaq NC3131,
> quad ethernet..)
>
> Bus 2, device 4, function 0:
> Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 5).
> ^^^^
Umm, no, that's actually an 82558 rev B. pci.ids should be updated to
have "Intel Corporation 8255[7-9]" for this id, because Intel can't make
up their minds to change the PCI id when they release a new product.
rev 1-3 are 82557, rev 4-5 are 82558, rev 6-8 are 82559.
> it is the same chip, this particular interface is 10mbit/half duplex, and
> all the interfaces transfer 1G+/day (some small files, some larger than 500 megs)
> with no problems, I should note this:
>
> eth0: OEM i82557/i82558 10/100 Ethernet, DE:AD:BA:BE:CA:FE, IRQ 10.
> Receiver lock-up bug exists -- enabling work-around.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The OEM probably forgot to initialized the eeprom correctly, because
82558 rev B and higher don't have this bug. Anyway, the workaround is
pretty harmless.
Ion
--
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-11 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-11 12:29 eepro100.c bug on 10Mbit half duplex (kernels 2.4.5 / 2.4.10 / 2.4.11pre6 / 2.4.11 / 2.4.10ac11) Robbert Kouprie
2001-10-11 16:27 ` John Gluck
2001-10-11 16:52 ` Robbert Kouprie
2001-10-11 17:15 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-11 17:29 ` Robbert Kouprie
2001-10-11 19:19 ` Robbert Kouprie
2001-10-11 19:34 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-11 21:02 ` Robbert Kouprie
2001-10-11 17:42 ` Matthew S. Hallacy
2001-10-11 20:08 ` Ion Badulescu [this message]
2001-10-11 20:16 ` Dan Hollis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-12 8:41 Robbert Kouprie
2001-10-12 13:40 ` Ion Badulescu
2001-10-13 18:16 ` Robbert Kouprie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200110112008.f9BK8dP20700@buggy.badula.org \
--to=ionut@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=poptix@techmonkeys.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox