From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <mckenney@eng4.beaverton.ibm.com>
Cc: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:14:19 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011012141419.4ea534b5.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.PTX.3.91.1011010185252.9717A-300000@eng4.beaverton.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.PTX.3.91.1011010185252.9717A-300000@eng4.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
"Paul E. McKenney" <mckenney@eng4.beaverton.ibm.com> wrote:
> Here are two patches. The wmbdd patch has been modified to use
> the lighter-weight SPARC instruction, as suggested by Dave Miller.
> The rmbdd patch defines an rmbdd() primitive that is defined to be
> rmb() on Alpha and a nop on other architectures. I believe this
> rmbdd() primitive is what Richard is looking for.
Surely we don't need both? If rmbdd exists, any code needing wmbdd
is terminally broken?
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-12 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-11 1:56 RFC: patch to allow lock-free traversal of lists with insertion Paul E. McKenney
2001-10-12 4:14 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2001-10-13 14:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-10 21:47 Paul McKenney
2001-10-10 22:22 ` Richard Henderson
2001-10-10 22:27 ` Richard Henderson
2001-10-10 1:19 Paul McKenney
2001-10-10 1:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-09 18:01 Paul McKenney
2001-10-09 17:46 Paul McKenney
2001-10-09 16:51 Manfred Spraul
2001-10-09 15:45 Paul McKenney
2001-10-09 17:00 ` Richard Henderson
2001-10-10 3:33 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-10-10 17:02 ` Richard Henderson
2001-10-09 15:28 Paul McKenney
2001-10-09 15:24 Paul McKenney
2001-10-09 5:27 Paul McKenney
2001-10-09 5:56 ` David S. Miller
2001-10-09 6:43 ` Richard Henderson
2001-10-09 1:55 Paul E. McKenney
2001-10-09 2:18 ` David S. Miller
2001-10-09 6:52 ` Richard Henderson
2001-10-09 9:03 ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-09 16:11 ` Richard Henderson
2001-10-10 1:39 ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-09 7:13 ` BALBIR SINGH
2001-10-09 7:46 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-10-09 8:21 ` BALBIR SINGH
2001-10-09 8:48 ` Dipankar Sarma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011012141419.4ea534b5.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mckenney@eng4.beaverton.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox