From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 23:04:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 23:04:12 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:58761 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 23:04:06 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 20:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20011016.200221.30185716.davem@redhat.com> To: yumoto@jpn.hp.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: New virtual ethernet driver submitting... From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <200110170247.f9H2l7g23588@hpujffg8.jpn.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <200110170247.f9H2l7g23588@hpujffg8.jpn.hp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Katsuyuki Yumoto Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:47:07 +0900 I've already written new two drivers of virtual ethernet. These aggregate(bundle) plural physical or virtual ethernet devices to single. How is this different to, or more beneficial than, what drivers/net/bonding.c is doing? Franks a lot, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com