From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:05:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:05:43 -0400 Received: from peace.netnation.com ([204.174.223.2]:36365 "EHLO peace.netnation.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:05:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 10:05:56 -0700 From: Simon Kirby To: "David S. Miller" Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Awfully slow /proc/net/tcp, netstat, in.identd in 2.4 (updated) Message-ID: <20011018100556.A4814@netnation.com> In-Reply-To: <20011018094222.A31919@netnation.com> <20011018.094956.107683652.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20011018.094956.107683652.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:49:56AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:49:56AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > Let me guess, the machine exhibiting the problem has the largest > amount of physical memory? You're right. I was wrong about the identical hardware -- somebody has recently added another 128 MB to the box, and so it has 640 MB in there at the moment. Most other boxes are 512 MB, and that other inactive server was only 128 MB. Ah, the one I was comparing it with was only 384 MB, even. So yeah, it's probably memory-size related. Simon- [ Stormix Technologies Inc. ][ NetNation Communications Inc. ] [ sim@stormix.com ][ sim@netnation.com ] [ Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employers. ]