From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 01:35:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 01:35:19 -0400 Received: from queen.bee.lk ([203.143.12.182]:24475 "EHLO queen.bee.lk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 01:35:06 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:35:46 +0600 From: Anuradha Ratnaweera To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Why XFS not in the main kernel? Message-ID: <20011023113546.A1310@bee.lk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Is there a reason not to include XFS in the mainstream kernel? It is very stable and many (including us) are using it in production environments without problems. Obviously, there can't be liscening issues, because XFS is released under GPL. Anuradha -- Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.12) It's no surprise that things are so screwed up: everyone that knows how to run a government is either driving taxicabs or cutting hair. -- George Burns