From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:11:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:11:37 -0400 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:17586 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:11:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 00:11:50 -0700 From: Richard Henderson To: Benjamin LaHaise Cc: Alan Cox , John Hawkes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc 3.0.1 warnings about multi-line literals Message-ID: <20011025001150.A8776@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: Benjamin LaHaise , Alan Cox , John Hawkes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com In-Reply-To: <20011022161527.K23213@redhat.com> <20011022165157.M23213@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011022165157.M23213@redhat.com>; from bcrl@redhat.com on Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 04:51:57PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 04:51:57PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > Which of the following is more readable: [...] Or (4): "btsl $0, %0 \n\ 1: \n\ .section .text.lock \n\ 2: cmpl $0,%0 \n\ bne 2b \n\ jmpl 1b \n\ .previous" r~