public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@gnu.org>
To: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@gnu.org>
Cc: "Jeffrey H. Ingber" <jhingber@ix.netcom.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Other computers HIGHLY degrading network performance (DoS?)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:13:13 +0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011026101313.A18310@bee.lk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011026084328.A14814@bee.lk> <1004064922.21997.7.camel@Eleusis> <20011026090505.A15880@bee.lk>
In-Reply-To: <20011026090505.A15880@bee.lk>; from anuradha@gnu.org on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 09:05:05AM +0600

On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 09:05:05AM +0600, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:55:16PM -0400, Jeffrey H. Ingber wrote:
> >
> > I think this is what QoS and the like are for.
> 
> Well, we _are_ going to solve the problem using a firewall between the router
> and the local area network.
> 
> But the real problem is a different one.
> 
> One machine begins an intensive downloading job.  How can this degrade the
> network performance even for ICMP packets between another machine and the
> router?  Notice that this can't be collitions because the download goes at
> 64kbps and the local network is 100 Mbps.  Something funny is going on to
> stop other people's packets.

Just found out that this is _not_ a problem of the "download accelerator", but
something to do with queuing algorithm of the router.  Even a normal wget
process or a big mail has a big impart on the network.  Hopefully an iptables
firewall would solve the problem.

Thanks.

Regards,

Anuradha

-- 

Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.13)

Television has brought back murder into the home -- where it belongs.
	-- Alfred Hitchcock


  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-26  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-26  2:43 Other computers HIGHLY degrading network performance (DoS?) Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26  2:55 ` Jeffrey H. Ingber
2001-10-26  3:05   ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26  4:13     ` Anuradha Ratnaweera [this message]
2001-10-26 10:56       ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2001-10-27  3:28         ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-27 10:06           ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2001-10-28  6:11             ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26 14:01       ` Martin Josefsson
2001-10-27  3:37         ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-27  8:40           ` Martin Josefsson
2001-10-26 12:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-27  3:06   ` Anuradha Ratnaweera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011026101313.A18310@bee.lk \
    --to=anuradha@gnu.org \
    --cc=jhingber@ix.netcom.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox