From: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@gnu.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@gnu.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Other computers HIGHLY degrading network performance (DoS?)
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 09:06:39 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011027090639.A2053@bee.lk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011026084328.A14814@bee.lk> <E15x6U0-0008Hs-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E15x6U0-0008Hs-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:53:08PM +0100
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:53:08PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Turning off byte range support in the web server works suprisingly well for
> it.
But won't it affect retry features of other `good' software such as wget? At
any rate, people are downloading from web/ftp sites on the Internet, which are
beyond our control, and apache hacks are anyway impossible. However, I am
thinking of setting up a transparent proxy (squid/iptables) on the firewall and
let it handle the bandwidth limiting and the like.
> Another non hacking code approach would be to set up CBQ or other bandwidth
> limiters so that the users of download accelerator get no benefit.
I don't mind hacking approaches. Otherwise, I won't be reading the LKML ;-)
> The advantage of the apache hacks is that you can make them actually suffer
That is a wonderful idea. Trying to exploit features on the Internet should be
a punishable offence ;)
Regards,
Anuradha
--
Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.13)
Exhilaration is that feeling you get just after a great idea hits you,
and just before you realize what is wrong with it.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-27 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-26 2:43 Other computers HIGHLY degrading network performance (DoS?) Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26 2:55 ` Jeffrey H. Ingber
2001-10-26 3:05 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26 4:13 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26 10:56 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2001-10-27 3:28 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-27 10:06 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2001-10-28 6:11 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26 14:01 ` Martin Josefsson
2001-10-27 3:37 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-27 8:40 ` Martin Josefsson
2001-10-26 12:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-27 3:06 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011027090639.A2053@bee.lk \
--to=anuradha@gnu.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox