From: Paul P Komkoff Jr <i@stingr.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Other computers HIGHLY degrading network performance (DoS?)
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 14:06:51 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011027140650.K41175@stingr.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011026084328.A14814@bee.lk> <1004064922.21997.7.camel@Eleusis> <20011026090505.A15880@bee.lk> <20011026101313.A18310@bee.lk> <20011026145621.J41175@stingr.net> <20011027092802.A2651@bee.lk>
In-Reply-To: <20011027092802.A2651@bee.lk>; from anuradha@gnu.org on Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 09:28:02AM +0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Replying to Anuradha Ratnaweera:
> It is a linux based propiatory product, and we don't have control over it.
Then pay attention to other's posts and check thru your network.
Maybe some of devices connected to hub have full duplex on and kill the
whole (your) network (collision domain)
maybe it is router itself, maybe some of your users think they're smart and
'why don't use fd if my nic offer this feature'.
I've fought these idiots some time ago. But my network include switches and
if any idiot connected to hub wish to play with duplex - then he only play
with his own collision domain - not larger then single department.
and if it is not duplex issue, then take lan tester and test your cabling
... then hub ...
then get rid of your "proprietary linux based product"
:)
- --
Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff 'Greatest' Jr // (icq)23200764 // (irc)Spacebar
PPKJ1-RIPE // (smtp)i@stingr.net // (http)stingr.net // (pgp)0xA4B4ECA4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAjvahzkACgkQyMW8naS07KQc1wCaA+V7mh80bIA8JEOCOtdvt5xn
PNYAoKQmotBJHdG1ri14yijbl6b7pgs8
=v/1K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-27 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-26 2:43 Other computers HIGHLY degrading network performance (DoS?) Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26 2:55 ` Jeffrey H. Ingber
2001-10-26 3:05 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26 4:13 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26 10:56 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2001-10-27 3:28 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-27 10:06 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr [this message]
2001-10-28 6:11 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-26 14:01 ` Martin Josefsson
2001-10-27 3:37 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-10-27 8:40 ` Martin Josefsson
2001-10-26 12:53 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-27 3:06 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011027140650.K41175@stingr.net \
--to=i@stingr.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox