From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:51:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:51:35 -0500 Received: from host154.207-175-42.redhat.com ([207.175.42.154]:23074 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:51:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:51:58 -0500 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: "David S. Miller" Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: please revert bogus patch to vmscan.c Message-ID: <20011029185158.L25434@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20011029183927.J25434@redhat.com> <20011029184821.K25434@redhat.com> <20011029.155056.23033599.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011029.155056.23033599.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:50:56PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:50:56PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > Numbers talk, bullshit walks. There is a correct way to do this optimization. If you're enough of an asshole to not care about doing it that way, great! -ben