From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Neale Banks <neale@lowendale.com.au>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Nasty suprise with uptime
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 23:46:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011029234615.A14476@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15yJD1-0003uO-00@the-village.bc.nu> <Pine.LNX.4.05.10110301839250.23080-100000@marina.lowendale.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.05.10110301839250.23080-100000@marina.lowendale.com.au>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 06:46:03PM +1100, Neale Banks wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > and received a nasty surprise. The uptime, which had been 496+ days
> > > on Friday, was back down to a few hours. I was ready to lart somebody
> > > with great vigor when I realized the uptime counter had simply wrapped
> > > around.
> > >
> > > So, I thought to myself, at least the 2.4 kernels on our new boxes won't
> >
> > It wraps at 496 days. The drivers are aware of it and dont crash the box
>
> You mean there was a time when uptime>496days would crash a system?
>
> If so, approximtely when did that get fixed?
>
> (I'm thinking back to an as yet unexplained crash of a 2.0.38 system at
> ~496days uptime :-( )
>
AFAIK, the system didn't crash, but the uptime counter went down to zero.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-30 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-29 20:31 Nasty suprise with uptime J Sloan
2001-10-29 20:40 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-29 20:39 ` J Sloan
2001-10-29 20:47 ` Matthew Dharm
2001-10-29 20:52 ` J Sloan
2001-11-09 0:45 ` Dr. Kelsey Hudson
2001-10-29 21:26 ` David Relson
2001-10-29 23:29 ` Jonathan Briggs
2001-10-30 8:53 ` george anzinger
2001-10-30 13:50 ` Tim Walberg
2001-10-30 14:47 ` GOMBAS Gabor
2001-10-30 15:39 ` Tim Walberg
2001-10-30 16:18 ` GOMBAS Gabor
2001-10-30 22:53 ` Mike Castle
2001-10-30 8:20 ` george anzinger
2001-10-30 9:47 ` bert hubert
2001-10-30 10:37 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-30 15:56 ` Chris Meadors
2001-10-30 16:22 ` Laurent de Segur
2001-10-30 21:53 ` [OT] " J Sloan
2001-10-30 22:52 ` Jan Dvorak
2001-10-30 23:25 ` [OT] " J Sloan
2001-10-30 7:46 ` Neale Banks
2001-10-30 7:46 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-10-30 8:15 ` Ville Herva
2001-10-30 8:22 ` Ville Herva
2001-10-30 8:36 ` J. Dow
2001-10-30 9:33 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-30 16:25 ` Matt Bernstein
2001-10-30 19:43 ` Oden Eriksson
2001-10-29 23:10 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-29 23:20 ` J Sloan
2001-10-29 23:28 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-30 8:21 ` Ville Herva
2001-10-31 22:36 ` J Sloan
2001-11-01 0:49 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-10-30 8:49 ` george anzinger
2001-10-30 18:17 ` J Sloan
2001-10-30 9:06 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-30 19:19 ` J Sloan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-30 16:35 Jesse Pollard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011029234615.A14476@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neale@lowendale.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox