From: Mike Kravetz <kravetz@us.ibm.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler ...
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:29:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011030212940.A1037@w-mikek2.sequent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011030161106.F1097@w-mikek2.des.beaverton.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.40.0110301629400.1495-100000@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0110301629400.1495-100000@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com>; from davidel@xmailserver.org on Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 05:06:16PM -0800
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Chat - VolanoMark simulator. Result is a measure of throughput.
> > Higher is better.
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> How does this test work exactly ?
> Did You measure the run queue length while this was running ?
> I'm going to modify LatSched to output other info like rqlen and
> tsk->counter at switch time.
> I'd like to have a schedcnt dump while this test is running.
> Anyway this test shows that what i'm doing now ( working on the balancing
> schemes ) is not wasted time :)
Take a look at our OLS presentation slides starting at:
http://lse.sourceforge.net/scheduling/ols2001/img50.htm
This is basically a message passing (via sockets) benchmark with
high thread counts/runqueue lengths.
I'll kick off the all important 'kernel build benchmark' and have
some results tomorrow.
--
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-31 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-30 5:38 [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 11:40 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-30 17:02 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 23:04 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-30 23:14 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 23:44 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-31 0:01 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 14:28 ` Hubertus Franke
2001-10-30 17:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 16:29 ` Hubertus Franke
2001-10-30 18:50 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-30 16:52 ` Hubertus Franke
2001-10-30 19:08 ` [Lse-tech] " Mike Kravetz
2001-10-30 19:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-31 0:11 ` [Lse-tech] " Mike Kravetz
2001-10-31 1:06 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-31 5:29 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2001-10-31 4:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-10-31 5:50 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-10-31 17:07 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-10-31 17:59 ` Davide Libenzi
[not found] <20011031151243.E1105@w-mikek2.des.beaverton.ibm.com>
2001-10-31 23:53 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-11-02 12:20 ` Hubertus Franke
2001-11-02 16:58 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-11-03 22:10 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011030212940.A1037@w-mikek2.sequent.com \
--to=kravetz@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=frankeh@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox