From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: Lista Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cdrecord from ext3
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:59:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011031155934.A18608@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011031001846.A1840@werewolf.able.es> <3BDF576F.3A797933@zip.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <3BDF576F.3A797933@zip.com.au>; from akpm@zip.com.au on Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 02:44:15 +0100
On 20011031 Andrew Morton wrote:
>"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
>
>> Kernel: 2.4.13-ac5+bproc, controller is an Adaptec
>>
>
>bproc? scyld distributed process thing, or something else?
>
Yep.
>Something strange is happening. Could you please investigate
>further? For example:
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs-1024k count=600
> time cat foo > /dev/null
>
>How long does the `cat' take on ext2 and ext3?
>
Tried several times. Basic script is:
rm -f foo
echo ext2 create:
time dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1024k count=600
sync
echo ext2 read:
time cat foo > /dev/null
rm -f foo
and results a similar to this (but read below..):
ext2 create:
600+0 records in
600+0 records out
0.02user 5.73system 0:27.43elapsed 20%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (119major+18minor)pagefaults 0swaps
ext2 read:
0.24user 4.85system 0:27.57elapsed 18%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (100major+17minor)pagefaults 0swaps
ext3 create:
600+0 records in
600+0 records out
0.00user 12.20system 1:12.28elapsed 16%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (119major+18minor)pagefaults 0swaps
ext3 read:
0.19user 6.30system 1:21.73elapsed 7%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (100major+17minor)pagefaults 0swaps
Did you noticed that the ext3 was at 20MHz, and ext2 was at 40MHz ? I
will reformat the 20MHz drive and make 2 slices, one ext2 and one ext3
to be sure not to compare apples and oranges...
--
J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you...
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.13-ac5-beo #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 00:10:00 CET 2001 i686
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-31 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-30 23:18 cdrecord from ext3 J . A . Magallon
2001-10-31 1:34 ` Daniel T. Chen
2001-10-31 1:44 ` Andrew Morton
2001-10-31 14:59 ` J . A . Magallon [this message]
2001-10-31 17:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-10-31 18:40 ` Mike Castle
2001-10-31 23:40 ` M. R. Brown
2001-10-31 23:57 ` Mike Castle
[not found] ` <200110311752.JAA06153@cesium.transmeta.com>
[not found] ` <20011031192425.A1757@werewolf.able.es>
[not found] ` <3BE04AA3.7010303@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <20011102010824.C12958@werewolf.able.es>
2001-11-02 0:09 ` cdrecord from ext3 [jamagallon@able.es] J . A . Magallon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011031155934.A18608@werewolf.able.es \
--to=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox