From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Lorenzo Allegrucci <lenstra@tiscalinet.it>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, riel@conectiva.com.br,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new OOM heuristic failure (was: Re: VM: qsbench)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:00:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011102140001.7c995186.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20011031185529.01fc4310@pop.tiscalinet.it>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0110311259570.2963-100000@imladris.surriel.com> <3.0.6.32.20011031185529.01fc4310@pop.tiscalinet.it>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 439 bytes --]
Hello Lorenzo,
please find attached next vmscan.c patch which sums up the delayed swap_out
(first patch), the fix for not swapping when nr_pages is reached, and (new) the
idea to swap more pages in one call to swap_out if priority gets higher.
I have not the slightest idea what all this does to the performance. Especially
the "more" swap_out code is a pure try-and-error type of thing. Can you do some
testing please?
Thanks,
Stephan
[-- Attachment #2: vmscan-patch2 --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1511 bytes --]
--- linux-orig/mm/vmscan.c Thu Nov 1 15:33:58 2001
+++ linux/mm/vmscan.c Fri Nov 2 13:50:31 2001
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@
static int FASTCALL(swap_out(unsigned int priority, unsigned int gfp_mask, zone_t * classzone));
static int swap_out(unsigned int priority, unsigned int gfp_mask, zone_t * classzone)
{
- int counter, nr_pages = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
+ int counter, nr_pages = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * DEF_PRIORITY / priority;
struct mm_struct *mm;
counter = mmlist_nr;
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@
{
struct list_head * entry;
int max_scan = nr_inactive_pages / priority;
- int max_mapped = nr_pages*10;
+ int max_mapped = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * DEF_PRIORITY / priority;
spin_lock(&pagemap_lru_lock);
while (--max_scan >= 0 && (entry = inactive_list.prev) != &inactive_list) {
@@ -469,16 +469,10 @@
spin_unlock(&pagecache_lock);
UnlockPage(page);
page_mapped:
- if (--max_mapped >= 0)
- continue;
+ if (max_mapped > 0)
+ max_mapped--;
+ continue;
- /*
- * Alert! We've found too many mapped pages on the
- * inactive list, so we start swapping out now!
- */
- spin_unlock(&pagemap_lru_lock);
- swap_out(priority, gfp_mask, classzone);
- return nr_pages;
}
/*
@@ -514,6 +508,14 @@
break;
}
spin_unlock(&pagemap_lru_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Alert! We've found too many mapped pages on the
+ * inactive list, so we start swapping out - delayed!
+ * -skraw
+ */
+ if (max_mapped==0 && nr_pages>0)
+ swap_out(priority, gfp_mask, classzone);
return nr_pages;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-02 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-31 12:12 VM: qsbench Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-10-31 12:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-10-31 15:00 ` new OOM heuristic failure (was: Re: VM: qsbench) Rik van Riel
2001-10-31 15:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-31 16:04 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-31 17:42 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-10-31 18:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-31 17:55 ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-10-31 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-31 21:31 ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-11-02 13:00 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2001-11-02 17:36 ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-10-31 17:55 ` VM: qsbench Lorenzo Allegrucci
[not found] <Pine.LNX.3.96.1011031133645.448B-100000@gollum.norang.ca>
2001-10-31 19:46 ` new OOM heuristic failure (was: Re: VM: qsbench) Linus Torvalds
[not found] <200111012108.WAA28044@webserver.ithnet.com>
[not found] ` <3.0.6.32.20011101214957.01feaa70@pop.tiscalinet.it>
2001-11-01 21:59 ` Lorenzo Allegrucci
2001-11-01 23:35 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-02 0:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-02 2:17 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-02 2:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-02 2:30 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-02 2:55 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-02 2:37 Ed Tomlinson
2001-11-02 3:01 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011102140001.7c995186.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=lenstra@tiscalinet.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox