Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]

Alexander Viro
2001-11-06T08:35:11Z

On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Petr Baudis wrote:

> > As far as I can see, I cannot read /proc/[pid]/* info using sysctl.
> That can be added. We just have existing interface, and I don't propose to
> stick on its actual state as it isn't convenient, but to extend it to cope our
> needs.

No, that cannot. Guys, you've been told: it won't happen. I think that
was loud and clear enough.

Can it. Get a dictionary and look up the meaning of "veto".

Oh, and as for "let's extend existing interfaces just because we had flunked
'strings in C'" - if you need Hurd, you know where to find it.