Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc

Jan-Benedict Glaw
2001-11-06T22:51:28Z

On Tue, 2001-11-06 15:46:43 -0700, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
wrote in message <3BE86853.9020305@candelatech.com>:
> Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> >On Tue, 2001-11-06 15:28:26 -0700, Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
> >wrote in message <20011106152826.C31923@codepoet.org>:
> >>On Tue Nov 06, 2001 at 07:24:13PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >>>PROCESSOR=0
> >>>VENDOR_ID=GenuineIntel
> >>>CPU_FAMILY=6
> >>>MODEL=6
> >>>MODEL_NAME="Celeron (Mendocino)"
> >>>.....
> >PROCESSOR=1
> or PROCESSOR1=1
>
> Either way, it's still trivial to parse with perl or c/c++/Java
> and probably a dozen other languages I don't know...

Come on - it's a cludge...

MfG, JBG

--
Jan-Benedict Glaw . jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481