Re: RFC: booleans and the kernel

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-01-24T18:33:07Z

Em Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 06:22:03PM +0000, Anton Altaparmakov escreveu:
> At 17:42 24/01/02, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >Actually I prefer 'bool' to '_Bool', if this becomes a kernel standard.
>
> I would be in favour of this as it does make code more readable. I use it
> in ntfs tng quite a bit (but I just typedef a BOOL type myself).
>
> If it is added, then _please_ don't use '_Bool', that's just sick...
> 'bool', heck even 'BOOL' would be better than that!

I'd vote for bool, long are the days when I programmed COBOL in original
3270 terminals, heck it seems like it was in a previous life 8)

/me scratches head, I should go back and update the kernel janitor TODO
list with this...

- Arnaldo