Re: [PATCH] lp.c, eexpress.c jiffies cleanup

[Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>]

On Nov 06, 2001  21:04 +0100, Tim Schmielau wrote:
> In eexpress.c I also turned absolute jiffies number into multiples of HZ,
> yet the resulting timeout values still do not always seem reasonable to
> me.

I agree.  It seems very ugly.  I looked at a few drivers which loop 1 or 2
jiffies, but to busy-loop for 1/10th of a second, or even 20 seconds
is terribly bad.  I took a look at the functions scb_rdcmd() and
scb_status() and they are only reading from an I/O port, so no chance
of sleeping/blocking, just busy waiting.

> -	unsigned long int oldtime = jiffies;
> -	while (scb_rdcmd(dev) && ((jiffies-oldtime)<10));
> +	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ/10;
> +	while (scb_rdcmd(dev) && (time_before(jiffies, timeout)));
>  	if (scb_rdcmd(dev)) {
>  		printk("%s: command didn't clear\n", dev->name);
>  	}
> @@ -1598,16 +1598,16 @@
>  #endif
> -                oj = jiffies;
> +                timeout = jiffies + 20*HZ;
>                  while ((SCB_CUstat(scb_status(dev)) == 2) &&
> -                       ((jiffies-oj) < 2000));
> +                       time_before(jiffies, timeout));
>  		if (SCB_CUstat(scb_status(dev)) == 2)
>  			printk("%s: warning, CU didn't stop\n", dev->name);
>                  lp->started &= ~(STARTED_CU);

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/