public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john slee <indigoid@higherplane.net>
To: "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:19:47 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011108171947.G2430@higherplane.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011107170836.A4782@hensema.net> <200111080022.fA80MHq68859@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200111080022.fA80MHq68859@saturn.cs.uml.edu>

On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:22:16PM -0500, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Splitting /proc can be done. Start by mounting procfs twice.
> Make non-process stuff in /proc invisible, but still available.
> Then in /kernel the process stuff can be disabled. The proc fs
> code can even register two filesystem types, with different
                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
			 ||||||||||||||||||||

this is the key part.  two filesystems and union mount should satisfy
backward compatibility needs while lspci and friends are migrating to
/kern.

this makes it a distribution issue, not a kernel issue, and there is no
need for special backwards-compatibility stuff in either kernfs or
procfs.

j.

-- 
R N G G   "Well, there it goes again... And we just sit 
 I G G G   here without opposable thumbs." -- gary larson

  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-08  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-06 21:21 PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc William Knop
2001-11-06 21:31 ` Erik Hensema
2001-11-06 22:09   ` Ricky Beam
2001-11-07 16:08     ` Erik Hensema
2001-11-07 16:19       ` lkml user
2001-11-08  0:22       ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-11-08  6:19         ` john slee [this message]
2001-11-08  8:14           ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-11-08 11:49             ` john slee
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-07 19:28 William Knop
2001-11-07 23:01 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2001-11-05 13:41 PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff] Petr Baudis
2001-11-06 18:56 ` PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]) Stephen Satchell
2001-11-06 20:12   ` PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc Erik Hensema
2001-11-06 20:58     ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-06 21:43       ` Ricky Beam
2001-11-06 22:14         ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-07  0:33           ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-11-07  7:20             ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-11-07  8:07               ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-07 17:24               ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-11-07 17:22                 ` Blue Lang
2001-11-07 19:21                   ` Ricky Beam
2001-11-11 10:27                     ` Kai Henningsen
2001-11-08  0:47                 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-11-08 18:53                   ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-11-08 21:28                     ` Ricky Beam
2001-11-09  5:15                     ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-11-19 19:22                     ` bill davidsen
2001-11-07  0:13         ` Martin Dalecki
2001-11-07  0:40           ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-11-07  1:10           ` Ricky Beam
     [not found]             ` <Pine.GSO.4.33.0111061947540.17287-100000@sweetums.bluetronic.ne t>
2001-11-07  1:17               ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-11-07 11:32             ` Martin Dalecki
2001-11-07 12:35         ` Remco Post
2001-11-07 23:53           ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-11-07 22:24         ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2001-11-07 23:15           ` Phil Howard
2001-11-06 21:24     ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-06 21:45       ` Erik Hensema
2001-11-06 22:06       ` Tim Jansen
2001-11-06 22:28       ` Erik Andersen
2001-11-06 22:33         ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2001-11-06 22:42           ` Erik Andersen
2001-11-06 22:49             ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2001-11-06 22:53             ` Patrick Mochel
2001-11-06 22:52               ` Erik Andersen
2001-11-06 22:46           ` Ben Greear
2001-11-06 22:50             ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2001-11-07  0:17           ` Martin Dalecki
2001-11-06 22:53     ` J . A . Magallon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011108171947.G2430@higherplane.net \
    --to=indigoid@higherplane.net \
    --cc=acahalan@cs.uml.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox