From: Frank de Lange <lkml-frank@unternet.org>
To: Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hang with 2.4.14 & vmware 3.0.x, anyone else seen this?
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 22:35:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011108223530.C11523@unternet.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89FED3F0389@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz>
In-Reply-To: <89FED3F0389@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz>; from VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz on Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:24:05PM +0000
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:24:05PM +0000, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Journaling will not do anything good in such case, as damaged kernel
> could write damaged data to your harddisk. You should run full fsck
> after every such lockup even if you are using journaled filesystem -
> - unless you are 100% sure that kernel really stoped doing anything
> instead of that it started doing strange things.
Hmmm, with ext3 that would not help you very much I think, given that the
journal is replayed before the fsck is performed (fsck can replay a journal
file). So if there's garbage in the journal, it might make its way into the
filesystem. Or it might confuse fsck...
I use reiserfs on another disk in the same box, which does not suffer from the
long fsck times, but does put a quite heavy load on the CPU during intense file
operations. Simple tests with ext3 seem to indicate that it suffers less from
this problem.
> Probably it is time for me to try Linus's kernel, but I have so perfect
> exprience with Alan ones that I'm a bit reluctant to do that.
Yeah, same here. I decided to try a Linus kernel 'cause of some unexplained and
unwarranted slowdowns - especially in interactive applications.
With mixed results, the slowdowns seem to be gone but other problems appear
(like the vmware hangs). I'm back to -ac for the moment (running 2.4.13-ac5,
waiting for others to bend or break the IDE patches :-)
Cheers//Frank
--
WWWWW _______________________
## o o\ / Frank de Lange \
}# \| / \
##---# _/ <Hacker for Hire> \
#### \ +31-320-252965 /
\ frank@unternet.org /
-------------------------
[ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-08 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-08 22:24 hang with 2.4.14 & vmware 3.0.x, anyone else seen this? Petr Vandrovec
2001-11-08 21:35 ` Frank de Lange [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-08 23:34 Petr Vandrovec
2001-11-08 22:39 ` Frank de Lange
2001-11-09 13:58 ` Alessandro Suardi
2001-11-09 19:26 ` Todd M. Roy
2001-11-08 21:08 Petr Vandrovec
2001-11-08 20:36 ` Frank de Lange
2001-11-08 23:19 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-08 16:39 Frank de Lange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011108223530.C11523@unternet.org \
--to=lkml-frank@unternet.org \
--cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox