public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Ben Israel <ben@genesis-one.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Disk Performance
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:20:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011109162028.A14567@codepoet.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011109155309.A14308@codepoet.org> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0111092056160.2963-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0111092056160.2963-100000@imladris.surriel.com>

On Fri Nov 09, 2001 at 08:57:07PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > But wouldn't it make more sense to enable DMA by default, except
> > for a set of blacklisted chipsets, rather then disabling it for
> > everybody just because some older chipsets are crap?
> 
> The kernel does this, but only if CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO
> is enabled ...

That seems to be the theory.  In practice every system in my house has 
that option enabled and yet only some controllers boot up with DMA enabled...

For example lets look at the following case.  This system has
an intel chipset builtin and a Promise PCI card.

    Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31
    ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
    PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
    PIIX4: chipset revision 1
    PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
	ide0: BM-DMA at 0xf000-0xf007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA
	ide1: BM-DMA at 0xf008-0xf00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:DMA
    PDC20267: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 68
    PCI: Found IRQ 5 for device 00:0d.0
    PDC20267: chipset revision 2
    PDC20267: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
	ide2: BM-DMA at 0xbc00-0xbc07, BIOS settings: hde:DMA, hdf:DMA
	ide3: BM-DMA at 0xbc08-0xbc0f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio, hdh:DMA
    hda: IBM-DPTA-373420, ATA DISK drive
    hdd: PCRW804, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
    hde: IBM-DTLA-307045, ATA DISK drive
    hdg: IBM-DTLA-307045, ATA DISK drive
    ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
    ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
    ide2 at 0xac00-0xac07,0xb002 on irq 5
    ide3 at 0xb400-0xb407,0xb802 on irq 5
    hda: 66055248 sectors (33820 MB) w/1961KiB Cache, CHS=4111/255/63, UDMA(33)
    hde: 90069840 sectors (46116 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=89355/16/63
    hdg: 90069840 sectors (46116 MB) w/1916KiB Cache, CHS=89355/16/63
    Partition check:
     hda: hda1 hda2
     hde: hde1
     hdg: hdg1

So the Intel one came up with DMA enabled,  No problem there.

The Promise controller has two identical 46.1GB IBM-DTLA-307045 7200
rpm hard drives on it.  The controller is capable of ATA100.  The hard
drives are capable of ATA100.  And yet even with CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO
set, these drives both come up running 3.39 MB/s.  

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--

  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-09 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-09 21:04 Disk Performance Ben Israel
2001-11-09 22:31 ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-09 22:53   ` Erik Andersen
2001-11-09 22:57     ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-09 23:20       ` Erik Andersen [this message]
2001-11-09 23:45         ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2001-11-11 19:24         ` Maxwell Spangler
2001-11-11 21:52           ` Andre Hedrick
2001-11-11 20:56             ` Maxwell Spangler
2001-11-11 22:17               ` Andre Hedrick
2001-11-12  6:02           ` Erik Andersen
2001-11-09 23:24     ` Alan Cox
2001-11-09 22:35 ` Doug McNaught
2001-11-09 23:33 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-11-09 23:50   ` Ben Greear
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-10  1:21 Torrey Hoffman
2001-11-10 16:47 ` Davidovac Zoran
2001-11-10 17:51   ` Erik Andersen
     [not found] <fa.jmrptbv.1dh8ur1@ifi.uio.no>
2001-11-10  8:03 ` Dan Maas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011109162028.A14567@codepoet.org \
    --to=andersen@codepoet.org \
    --cc=ben@genesis-one.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox