public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@idb.hist.no>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:59:05 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011112205905.4a695ed3.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BEBBB21.357149FC@idb.hist.no>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111081802380.15975-100000@localhost.localdomain.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111081836080.15975-100000@localhost.localdomain.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <p731yj8kgvw.fsf@amdsim2.suse.de> <20011109141215.08d33c96.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <3BEBBB21.357149FC@idb.hist.no>

On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 12:16:49 +0100
Helge Hafting <helgehaf@idb.hist.no> wrote:

> Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> > Modules have lots of little disadvantages that add up.  The speed penalty
> > on various platforms is one, the load/unload race complexity is another.
> > 
> Races can be fixed.  (Isn't that one of the things considered for 2.5?)

We get more problems if we go preemptible (some seem to thing that preemption
is "free").  And some races can be fixed by paying more of a speed penalty
(atomic_inc & atomic_dec_and_test for every packet, anyone?).

Hope that clarifies,
Rusty.


  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-12 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111081802380.15975-100000@localhost.localdomain.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111081836080.15975-100000@localhost.localdomain.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-11-08 23:00   ` speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives? Andi Kleen
2001-11-09  0:05     ` Anton Blanchard
2001-11-09  5:45       ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-09  6:04         ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09  6:39           ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-09  6:54             ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-09  7:17               ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09  7:16                 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-09  7:24                   ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09  8:21                   ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-09  7:35                     ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-09  7:44                       ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09  7:14             ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09  7:16             ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 12:59               ` Alan Cox
2001-11-09 12:54                 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 13:15                   ` Philip Dodd
2001-11-09 13:26                     ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 20:45                       ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-09 13:17                   ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-09 13:25                     ` David S. Miller
2001-11-09 13:39                       ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-09 13:41                         ` David S. Miller
2001-11-10  5:20               ` Anton Blanchard
2001-11-10  4:56             ` Anton Blanchard
2001-11-10  5:09               ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-10 13:29               ` David S. Miller
2001-11-10 13:44                 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-10 13:52                 ` David S. Miller
2001-11-10 14:29                   ` Numbers: ext2/ext3/reiser Performance (ext3 is slow) Oktay Akbal
2001-11-10 14:47                     ` arjan
2001-11-10 17:41                       ` Oktay Akbal
2001-11-10 17:56                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-15 17:24                         ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-11-12 16:59               ` [patch] arbitrary size memory allocator, memarea-2.4.15-D6 Ingo Molnar
2001-11-12 18:19                 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-11-12 23:26                   ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-13 15:59                   ` Riley Williams
2001-11-14 20:49                     ` Tom Gall
2001-11-15  1:11                     ` Anton Blanchard
2001-11-17 18:00                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-11-09  3:12     ` speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives? Rusty Russell
2001-11-09  5:59       ` Andi Kleen
2001-11-09 11:16       ` Helge Hafting
2001-11-12  9:59         ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2001-11-12 23:23           ` David S. Miller
2001-11-12 23:14             ` Rusty Russell
2001-11-13  1:30               ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-13  1:15                 ` David Lang
2001-11-08 16:01 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-08 17:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-08 17:37   ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-08 23:59   ` Anton Blanchard
2001-11-09  5:11     ` Keith Owens
2001-11-10  3:35       ` Anton Blanchard
2001-11-10  7:26         ` Keith Owens
2001-11-08 17:53 ` Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011112205905.4a695ed3.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=helgehaf@idb.hist.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox