From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:35:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:35:16 -0500 Received: from dsl254-112-233.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.254.112.233]:21632 "EHLO snark.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:35:02 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:33:14 -0500 From: "Eric S. Raymond" To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] CML 1.8.4 is available Message-ID: <20011114123314.A1978@thyrsus.com> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com Mail-Followup-To: "Eric S. Raymond" , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20011113175010.A15716@thyrsus.com> <20011113182718.A1630@kroah.com> <20011114123325.A500@thyrsus.com> <20011114100020.A5287@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011114100020.A5287@kroah.com>; from greg@kroah.com on Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 10:00:21AM -0800 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH : > > Historical reasons. My rulebase was opriginally one big file for editing > > conveniece. What directory whould the USB serial stuff live in? > > drivers/usb/serial > > > > There doesn't seem to be any rules set up for drivers/hotplug. > > > > What symbols should be in there, > > CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI > CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_COMPAQ > CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_COMPAQ_NVRAM > > See the Config.in file in that directory for the dependencies they have > on each other. OK, this wiull be in 1.8.6. I'm going to have to figure out why my coverage tools didn't catch those three symbols. -- Eric S. Raymond Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them. -- Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491