From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Matt Bernstein <matt@theBachChoir.org.uk>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
Alastair Stevens <alastair.stevens@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Athlon SMP blues - kernels 2.4.[9 13 15-pre4]
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:37:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011115193717.B14221@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BF285D7.8F5AAB6E@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111141502110.8473-100000@nick.dcs.qmul.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111141502110.8473-100000@nick.dcs.qmul.ac.uk>; from matt@theBachChoir.org.uk on Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 03:08:25PM +0000
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 03:08:25PM +0000, Matt Bernstein wrote:
> I hope they do; I've just set up a very similar beast (looks like the same
> mobo and same CPUs). Is the RAM "registered" ECC? Are your CPUs the same
> stepping? One problem we were bitten by was the Radeon DRI, so we disabled
> it (in XF86Config-4) and it now seems to at least boot into X.
There are known problems in AMD760+Radeon setups, and a workaround is
to avoid asserting RADEON_SOFT_RESET_HBP during init. The latest
kernels have that fix in the radeon drm. Using that in conjunction
with an X server containing the same fix, I've finally got a stable
761+radeon setup here.
I think the X server fix went in on the 4.1.99 branch, but I know that
at least the Red Hat XFree86-4.1 rpms have got the patch back-ported.
> it's not any faster than a dual PIII (1GHz) at the task it's meant to
> perform :( both CPUs report 75% usage, and vmstat 1 doesn't show the IO
> systems being slugged. Very strange. We're wondering if we've hit memory
> bandwidth as the tasks involve some hard sums with big matrices.
If the CPUs were bottlenecked on memory then they would still be
pegged at 100% according to the OS. They'd just get less work done in
a given interval.
Cheers,
Stephen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-15 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-14 14:35 Athlon SMP blues - kernels 2.4.[9 13 15-pre4] Alastair Stevens
2001-11-14 14:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-14 15:04 ` Alastair Stevens
2001-11-14 15:12 ` Charles Cazabon
2001-11-14 15:08 ` Matt Bernstein
2001-11-14 15:33 ` M. Edward Borasky
2001-11-15 19:37 ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
2001-11-14 15:13 ` Andreas Boman
2001-11-14 15:24 ` John Jasen
2001-11-14 15:28 ` Christian Bornträger
2001-11-14 15:28 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-11-14 15:38 ` Alastair Stevens
2001-11-14 16:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-11-14 19:59 ` Dan Hollis
2001-11-14 15:31 ` Matthew Sell
2001-11-14 17:32 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-11-14 19:48 ` Dan Hollis
2001-11-14 15:21 ` Matthew Sell
2001-11-14 15:33 ` Alastair Stevens
2001-11-14 16:15 ` Alastair Stevens
2001-11-14 16:28 ` Momchil Velikov
2001-11-14 17:34 ` Philippe Amelant
2001-11-14 16:58 ` Charles Marslett
2001-11-14 17:40 ` Gérard Roudier
2001-11-14 20:08 ` Dan Hollis
2001-11-14 19:52 ` Scott Russell
2001-11-14 20:01 ` Dan Hollis
2001-11-14 19:47 ` Dan Hollis
2001-11-14 20:48 ` Herbert Xu
2001-11-14 21:10 ` Stephen Frost
2001-11-15 10:44 ` [OT] Athlon SMP blues - SOLVED by gpm Alastair Stevens
2001-11-15 12:33 ` Paul G. Allen
2001-11-16 18:51 ` Athlon SMP blues - kernels 2.4.[9 13 15-pre4] bert hubert
2001-11-15 1:37 ` Paul G. Allen
2001-11-15 5:22 ` Jason L Tibbitts III
2001-11-15 10:01 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-14 15:07 Brian Raymond
2001-11-14 15:15 Philip Dodd
2001-11-14 15:28 ` Philip Dodd
[not found] <fa.fqeqjiv.4hidhq@ifi.uio.no>
2001-11-14 16:46 ` Dan Maas
2001-11-14 17:44 Ryan C. Bonham
2001-11-15 21:53 Dieter Nützel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011115193717.B14221@redhat.com \
--to=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=alastair.stevens@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@theBachChoir.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox