From: faceprint@faceprint.com (Nathan Walp)
To: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
Cc: Jeff Golds <jgolds@resilience.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD SMP capability sanity checking.
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 23:11:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011116231141.A3030@faceprint.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BF5952E.E73BB648@resilience.com> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111162353140.32578-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111162353140.32578-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1076 bytes --]
> Whats probably closer to the truth is..
>
> make cpu
> |
> smp tests run ok ? ------> No, sell as XP
> |
> yes, sell as MP
>
Actually, it's probably closer to:
make cpu
|
smp tests run ok? -------> No, sell as XP
|
yes, do we have more demand
for XPs than we have supply
of those that didn't pass? -------> Yes, sell as XP
|
No, sell as MP
Remember, AMD is just trying to make a buck. If they've got a bunch of
MP CPUs "sitting on the shelves" while no one can get their hands on the
XPs, some of those MPs are going to "become" XPs. For those of us on a
budget, we can only hope to get one of *those* variety of XPs.
Now, that said, I'm probably going to buy MPs when I build my machine,
as long as the price difference stays as the current low levels.
Consider it a "warranty" or something.
Just my $0.02
Nathan
--
Nathan Walp || faceprint@faceprint.com
GPG Fingerprint: || http://faceprint.com/
5509 6EF3 928B 2363 9B2B DA17 3E46 2CDC 492D DB7E
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-17 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-16 21:30 [PATCH] AMD SMP capability sanity checking Dave Jones
2001-11-16 19:42 ` Gérard Roudier
2001-11-16 21:41 ` Randy.Dunlap
2001-11-16 21:46 ` Dave Jones
2001-11-16 21:44 ` Dan Hollis
2001-11-16 22:02 ` Dave Jones
2001-11-16 21:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-11-16 21:59 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-11-16 22:11 ` Dave Jones
2001-11-16 22:37 ` Jeff Golds
2001-11-16 23:04 ` Dave Jones
2001-11-17 0:33 ` Jeff Golds
2001-11-17 0:39 ` Dave Jones
2001-11-17 0:59 ` Andreas Boman
2001-11-17 1:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-17 4:11 ` Nathan Walp [this message]
2001-11-17 4:59 ` Mark Orr
2001-11-16 23:40 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-11-16 23:47 ` Dave Jones
2001-11-17 1:05 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-11-17 1:09 ` Dan Hollis
2001-11-17 1:11 ` Dave Jones
2001-11-17 1:10 ` Dave Jones
2001-11-21 0:42 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011116231141.A3030@faceprint.com \
--to=faceprint@faceprint.com \
--cc=davej@suse.de \
--cc=jgolds@resilience.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox