From: "G . Sumner Hayes" <sumner-kernel-nospam@forceovermass.com>
To: "François Cami" <stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: James A Sutherland <jas88@cam.ac.uk>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Swap vs No Swap.
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:36:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011122143639.A2964@forceovermass.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BFD4F57.8030408@wanadoo.fr>; from stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 08:17:43PM +0100
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 08:17:43PM +0100, François Cami wrote:
> James A Sutherland wrote:
>
> > Hmm... if you've experimented with this, how does this setup compare
> > to a striped RAID of hda+hdc used for root and swap? (i.e. is the
> > speedup down to splitting accesses between two spindles?)
>
> I haven't, but it's a good idea, I may give it a try, but not very soon.
You shouldn't need striping for this--if you have two swap partitions
with equal priority, the kernel will "stripe" them itself.
At least that's my understanding.
Sumner
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-22 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-22 1:53 Swap vs No Swap war
2001-11-22 2:23 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-11-22 2:31 ` war
2001-11-22 2:58 ` Mark Hahn
2001-11-22 4:09 ` listmail
2001-11-22 5:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-22 5:30 ` war
2001-11-22 5:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-22 9:50 ` Christian Bornträger
2001-11-22 8:50 ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-22 11:00 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 16:00 ` war
2001-11-22 16:08 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 16:57 ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-22 18:56 ` François Cami
2001-11-22 18:58 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 19:17 ` François Cami
2001-11-22 19:36 ` G . Sumner Hayes [this message]
2001-11-22 20:37 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-23 6:30 ` Charles Marslett
2001-11-23 9:13 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-23 16:46 ` Charles Marslett
2001-11-22 16:25 ` war
2001-11-22 16:37 ` Ryan Cumming
2001-11-22 17:39 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 17:56 ` war
[not found] ` <01112211150302.00690@argo>
2001-11-22 16:01 ` war
2001-11-22 16:12 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 16:36 ` war
2001-11-22 16:33 ` Bjorn Wesen
2001-11-22 17:37 ` Thomas S. Iversen
2001-11-22 21:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-11-22 17:41 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-22 17:56 ` war
2001-11-22 18:08 ` James A Sutherland
2001-11-23 22:05 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-22 16:11 Elgar, Jeremy
2001-11-22 16:22 ` Ryan Cumming
2001-11-22 16:22 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-22 16:29 Elgar, Jeremy
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10111221006010.29736-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-11-22 16:34 ` war
2001-11-26 20:18 ` Kent Borg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011122143639.A2964@forceovermass.com \
--to=sumner-kernel-nospam@forceovermass.com \
--cc=jas88@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=stilgar2k@wanadoo.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox