From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:03:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:03:24 -0500 Received: from host154.207-175-42.redhat.com ([207.175.42.154]:24521 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:03:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:03:06 -0500 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: Trond Myklebust Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: Fix knfsd readahead cache in 2.4.15 Message-ID: <20011128160306.F23086@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <15362.18626.303009.379772@charged.uio.no> <15362.53694.192797.275363@esther.cse.unsw.edu.au> <20011126.155347.45872112.davem@redhat.com> <20011126202509.J15582@redhat.com> <15363.39718.446155.619699@charged.uio.no> <20011127102348.A19330@redhat.com> <15363.46302.205479.958516@charged.uio.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15363.46302.205479.958516@charged.uio.no>; from trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no on Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:44:30PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:44:30PM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Ah, OK. Sorry for being so dense ;-) > > Yeah, that would be an improvement for knfsd too. The current scheme > can only manage readahead for 1 reader per inode. > Are there any records of a more detailed discussion of how to go about > implementing such a readahead strategy for Linux? Not yet. I'm hoping to write such a patch in the next couple of months for 2.5. -ben -- Fish.