From: "Leonard N. Zubkoff" <lnz@dandelion.com>
To: pascal.lengard@wanadoo.fr
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dac960 broken ?
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:06:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200111292006.fATK6NMF021272@dandelion.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111291939310.17742-100000@h2o.chezmoi.fr> (message from Pascal Lengard on Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:42:01 +0100 (CET))
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:42:01 +0100 (CET)
From: Pascal Lengard <pascal.lengard@wanadoo.fr>
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Leonard N. Zubkoff wrote:
> Hmmm. Nothing you've described makes any sense to me as I don't believe
> the driver has changed in a way that would break the basic detection of the
> boards. When you say that the card is not detected, precisely what do you
> mean? Does the driver report anything at all?
OK, I did not write down the messages, but while testing, with DAC960
compiled as module, It did load and initialise but said "no such peripheral"
or something equivalent once (I know it's not precise enough ...).
I ran some tests to record precise messages today:
Here are the messages from the kernel 2.4.9-13 shipped by redhat:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Loading scsi_mod module
Loading DAC960 module
/lib/DAC960.o: init_module: Operation not permitted
Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters
ERROR /bin/insmod exited abnormally!
Loading jbd module
Journalled Block Device driver loaded
Loading ext3 module
Mounting /proc filesystem
Creaing root device
Mounting root filesystem
mount: error 19 mounting ext3
pivotroot: pivot_root(/sysroot,/sysroot/initrd) failed: 2
Freeing unused kernel memory: 216k freed
Kernel panic: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel
Hmmm. Can you check if the following patch is present in the Linux kernel
you're using:
--- linux/init/main.c- Sat Oct 6 08:49:16 2001
+++ linux/init/main.c Wed Oct 10 09:06:07 2001
@@ -221,6 +221,24 @@
{ "dasdg", (DASD_MAJOR << MINORBITS) + (6 << 2) },
{ "dasdh", (DASD_MAJOR << MINORBITS) + (7 << 2) },
#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DAC960) || defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DAC960_MODULE)
+ { "rd/c0d0p",0x3000 },
+ { "rd/c0d1p",0x3008 },
+ { "rd/c0d2p",0x3010 },
+ { "rd/c0d3p",0x3018 },
+ { "rd/c0d4p",0x3020 },
+ { "rd/c0d5p",0x3028 },
+ { "rd/c0d6p",0x3030 },
+ { "rd/c0d7p",0x3038 },
+ { "rd/c0d8p",0x3040 },
+ { "rd/c0d9p",0x3048 },
+ { "rd/c0d10p",0x3050 },
+ { "rd/c0d11p",0x3058 },
+ { "rd/c0d12p",0x3060 },
+ { "rd/c0d13p",0x3068 },
+ { "rd/c0d14p",0x3070 },
+ { "rd/c0d15p",0x3078 },
+#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_DA) || defined(CONFIG_BLK_CPQ_DA_MODULE)
{ "ida/c0d0p",0x4800 },
{ "ida/c0d1p",0x4810 },
Without this patch, which Linux has repeatedly refused to include in the
standard sources, it is entirely possible that the root= processing won't work
correctly.
Leonard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-29 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-28 14:19 dac960 broken ? Pascal Lengard
2001-11-28 15:43 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-29 9:58 ` Pascal Lengard
2001-11-29 16:55 ` John Jasen
2001-11-29 6:15 ` Leonard N. Zubkoff
2001-11-29 6:37 ` Doug Ledford
2001-11-29 18:42 ` Pascal Lengard
2001-11-29 20:06 ` Leonard N. Zubkoff [this message]
2001-11-30 10:56 ` Pascal Lengard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200111292006.fATK6NMF021272@dandelion.com \
--to=lnz@dandelion.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pascal.lengard@wanadoo.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox