From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: randall@uph.com, Balbir Singh <balbir_soni@yahoo.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch: Fix serial module use count (2.4.16 _and_ 2.5)
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 10:56:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011130105633.A18992@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200111291803.fATI37q08404@sword.damocles.com> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011130112041.15249C-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011130112041.15249C-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>; from macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl on Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 11:44:14AM +0100
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 11:44:14AM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Here is a fix I'm using for 2.4. It was submitted to Alan once, then a
> discussion was performed with a conclusion like "that may be a temporary
> fix for 2.4, but it needs a complete rework for 2.5". I'm not sure if the
> patch went in anywhere.
Have you audited all the tty drivers in 2.4 to make sure that they clean
up safely?
I don't believe the serial code will clean up safely as it stands for
starters if block_til_ready in serial.c fails, leaving an interrupt
in use. Further attempts to open the serial device will probably fail.
Try this as any user with your patch applied:
$ stty -clocal -F /dev/ttyS0
$ cat /proc/interrupts
$ cat /dev/ttyS0
^c
$ cat /proc/interrupts
I think you'll find your serial port interrupt is still claimed, despite
the module being marked as not in use.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-30 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-29 16:06 Patch: Fix serial module use count (2.4.16 _and_ 2.5) Balbir Singh
2001-11-29 16:17 ` Russell King
2001-11-30 4:25 ` BALBIR SINGH
2001-11-30 9:36 ` Russell King
2001-11-30 22:19 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-30 23:06 ` Russell King
2001-12-01 0:20 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-11-29 18:03 ` Jeff Randall
2001-11-29 18:12 ` Russell King
2001-11-29 18:44 ` Jeff Randall
2001-11-29 19:05 ` James Simmons
2001-11-30 10:44 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2001-11-30 10:56 ` Russell King [this message]
2001-11-30 12:11 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-29 13:10 Russell King
2001-11-29 13:48 ` BALBIR SINGH
2001-11-29 15:37 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011130105633.A18992@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=balbir_soni@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=randall@uph.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox