Re: Patch: Fix serial module use count (2.4.16 _and_ 2.5)

BALBIR SINGH
2001-11-29T14:00:52Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3433 bytes --]

Russell King wrote:

>Hi,
>
>The existing serial.c contains a nice module use count bug which is easily
>triggerable. Without anything connected to ttyS0, do:
>
> stty -clocal -F /dev/ttyS0
> stty -aF /dev/ttyS0
>
>Hit ^c, lsmod shows use count of -1. Repeat to decrement further.
>
>Here's a patch that fixes this bogosity - please see the comment within
>the patch for the reason.
>
>Marcelo, please apply to both 2.4.
>Linus, please apply to 2.5 as a stop-gap until my new serial drivers are
>ready to be merged.
>
>Thanks.
>
>--- linux-orig/drivers/char/serial.c Tue Nov 13 12:37:12 2001
>+++ linux/drivers/char/serial.c Thu Nov 29 13:07:52 2001
>@@ -3133,6 +3133,10 @@
> * enables interrupts for a serial port, linking in its async structure into
> * the IRQ chain. It also performs the serial-specific
> * initialization for the tty structure.
>+ *
>+ * Note that on failure, we don't decrement the module use count - the tty
>+ * later will call rs_close, which will decrement it for us as long as
>+ * tty->driver_data is set non-NULL. --rmk
> */
> static int rs_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file * filp)
> {
>@@ -3153,10 +3157,8 @@
> }
> tty->driver_data = info;
> info->tty = tty;
>- if (serial_paranoia_check(info, tty->device, "rs_open")) {
>- MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
>+ if (serial_paranoia_check(info, tty->device, "rs_open"))
> return -ENODEV;
>- }
>
> #ifdef SERIAL_DEBUG_OPEN
> printk("rs_open %s%d, count = %d\n", tty->driver.name, info->line,
>@@ -3171,10 +3173,8 @@
> */
> if (!tmp_buf) {
> page = get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
>- if (!page) {
>- MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
>+ if (!page)
> return -ENOMEM;
>- }
>

The current code on my system 2.5.0 looks like

if (!page) {
MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
return -ENOMEM;
}

I was wondering that if the open failed with something like this

open(/dev/ttyS0, args) = -ENOMEM;

why would somebody call close on /dev/ttyS0? If you call close on
a descriptor that failed to open, it is *BAD* code. I am assuming
that the tty layer that talks to the serial driver calls rs_close().

The same thing applies to the code below. I think that the open routine
should instead set tty->driver_data to NULL upon failure.

Comments,
Balbir Singh.

>
> if (tmp_buf)
> free_page(page);
> else
>@@ -3188,7 +3188,6 @@
> (info->flags & ASYNC_CLOSING)) {
> if (info->flags & ASYNC_CLOSING)
> interruptible_sleep_on(&info->close_wait);
>- MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
> #ifdef SERIAL_DO_RESTART
> return ((info->flags & ASYNC_HUP_NOTIFY) ?
> -EAGAIN : -ERESTARTSYS);
>@@ -3201,10 +3200,8 @@
> * Start up serial port
> */
> retval = startup(info);
>- if (retval) {
>- MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
>+ if (retval)
> return retval;
>- }
>
> retval = block_til_ready(tty, filp, info);
> if (retval) {
>@@ -3212,7 +3209,6 @@
> printk("rs_open returning after block_til_ready with %d\n",
> retval);
> #endif
>- MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
> return retval;
> }
>
>
>
>--
>Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

[-- Attachment #2: InterScan_Disclaimer.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 855 bytes --]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to Wipro and/or its Customers and
is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is
addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without
proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this
information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please
notify us immediately at mailto:mailadmin@wipro.com and delete this mail
from your records.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------