From: "Joe Rice" <jrice@bigidea.com>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Still having problems with eepro100
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:49:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011130184916.A13868@bigidea.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011130180827.E2265@bigidea.com> <20011130163721.J504@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011130163721.J504@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>; from mfedyk@matchmail.com on Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:37:21PM -0800
i guess that explains why i haven't seen the problem again
on the bed of machines with 2.4.16.
Could please explain how you came to your answer?
maybe this is to obvious to be addressed on the list, but
please give me a clue.
thanks,
joe
www.bigidea.com
Mike Fedyk(mfedyk@matchmail.com)@Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:37:21PM -0800:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:08:27PM -0600, Joe Rice wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > I'm having the same type of problems that was talked
> > about in this thread. I have seen the same error
> > on kernels 2.4.7 - 2.4.10, which is:
> >
> > eth0: card reports no resources.
> > __alloc_pages: 0_order allocation failed (gfp=0x20/0) from c012da00
> >
> > at which point i see NFS timeouts or the machine hangs
> > and requires a cold reboot.
> >
> > also, I haven't had any luck with the Intel e100 driver.
> >
>
> e100 probably doesn't help because that is a VM issue triggered by nfs and
> networking.
>
> >
> > I'm now testing on 10 of the nodes the 2.4.16 kernel. They
> > have been under a moderate load and i haven't seen any
> > problems yet. I still plan on doing a large load test
> > on this newer kernel.
> >
>
> Let us know if there's any problems. And if things are better that wouldn't
> hurt reporting either ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-01 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-01 0:08 Still having problems with eepro100 Joe Rice
2001-12-01 0:37 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-12-01 0:49 ` Joe Rice [this message]
2001-12-01 1:07 ` Mike Fedyk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-30 11:39 Johan
2001-10-30 11:57 ` Thomas Langås
2001-10-30 12:05 ` Johan
2001-10-30 12:58 ` Kirill Ratkin
2001-10-30 20:19 ` Kurt Roeckx
2001-10-30 12:09 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-30 12:20 ` Rafael Martinez
2001-10-30 16:23 ` Lee Packham
2001-10-30 16:51 ` Kirill Ratkin
2001-10-30 17:07 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-10-31 14:40 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-11-01 11:15 ` Andrey Savochkin
2001-11-01 11:33 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011130184916.A13868@bigidea.com \
--to=jrice@bigidea.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox