Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin

Daniel Phillips
2002-01-29T10:16:55Z

On January 29, 2002 10:55 am, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Rob Landley wrote:
>
> > The holder of the patch penguin would feed Linus good patches, by Linus's
> > standards. Not just tested ones, but small bite-sized patches, one per email
> > as plain text includes, with an explanation of what each patch does at the
> > top of the mail. (Just the way Linus likes them. :) Current pending patches
> > from the patch penguin tree could even be kept at a public place (like
> > kernel.org) so Linus could pull rather than push, and grab them when he has
> > time. The patch penguin tree would make sure that when Linus is ready for a
> > patch, the patch is ready for Linus.
>
> Looks like a manual re-implementation of a bug/request/patch tracker
> like sourceforge's, bugzilla or whatever, with some additions.

And you load a patch into it by emailing to the bot, not via the web
interface. The web interface is just for a) reporting b) maintainance, i.e.,
closing out a patch that got applied in some altered form, or applied with no
notification to the bot, or obsoleted.

> A patch
> is added to the system, it gets a version tag, and you just pull it, and
> mark it closed if applied to Linus' tree. If Linus releases a new tree,
> the patch is marked stale until the maintainer uploads an updated patch
> or just reopens it to mark "still applies unchanged to new version". (No
> CVS involved, BTW.)

Yes, very much yes. This way it just looks like regular email to Linus -
except for some hopefully useful bookkeeping gack prepended to the top of the
mail by the bot - and doesn't change the way he works at all.

--
Daniel