From: Greg Hennessy <gsh@cox.rr.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: horrible disk thorughput on itanium
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:07:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011206110713.A8404@cox.rr.com> (raw)
I recently installed a both a Dell dual cpu 2500 server (dual 1.6 ghz
ia32 chips) and a dell 7150 (dual IA64 chips). My users complained
that the disk io speed on the itanium seemed very slow, even though
both servers have a megaraid controller with seagate cheetah
disks. Bonnie also shows the ia64 machine having worse throughput than
the ia32 machine.
[root@hydra bonnie]# cat bonnie.hydra bonnie.leo
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input--
--Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block---
--Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU
/sec %CPU
100 1765 100.0 282891 100.1 377295 100.0 2058 100.0 592709
99.5 51920.4 196.5
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input--
--Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block---
--Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU
/sec %CPU
100 17049 100.1 265197 101.0 197094 98.2 16631 100.4 675831
99.0 40400.0 191.9
Hydra is the itanium, leo is the 32 bit machine. The character io of
hydra is a factor of 10 slower than that of leo. Is this more likely a
kernel issue, or a glibc issue? Both machiness run standard redhat
7.1, and 2.4.9-12smp kernels.
next reply other threads:[~2001-12-06 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-06 16:07 Greg Hennessy [this message]
2001-12-06 16:17 ` horrible disk thorughput on itanium Arjan van de Ven
2001-12-06 20:47 ` Andrew Morton
2001-12-09 23:13 ` Kurt Garloff
[not found] <20011206110713.A8404@cox.rr.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3C0FD955.4510B738@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-12-06 22:13 ` Andi Kleen
2001-12-07 6:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-12-07 6:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-07 12:32 ` Greg Hennessy
2001-12-07 17:57 ` Marco Colombo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-07 6:42 Dan Kegel
[not found] <p73r8q86lpn.fsf@amdsim2.suse.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112070710120.747-100000@mikeg.weiden.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <9upmqm$7p4$1@penguin.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-12-07 13:54 ` Andi Kleen
2001-12-07 14:20 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 16:14 ` Richard Gooch
2001-12-07 17:18 ` Robert Love
2001-12-07 17:40 ` Richard Gooch
2001-12-07 17:48 ` Robert Love
2001-12-07 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-07 17:58 ` Andi Kleen
2001-12-07 18:14 ` Michael Poole
2001-12-07 18:35 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 21:22 ` Michael Poole
2001-12-07 21:37 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 22:26 ` Michael Poole
2001-12-07 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-07 18:41 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 18:33 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 20:44 ` Greg Hennessy
2001-12-07 21:37 ` Marco Colombo
2001-12-07 20:42 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011206110713.A8404@cox.rr.com \
--to=gsh@cox.rr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox