From: "Ragnar Kjørstad" <nfs@ragnark.vestdata.no>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Steffen Persvold <sp@scali.no>, Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
nfs list <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NFS] Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: 2.4.9 kernel crash
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 21:52:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011206215258.A30580@vestdata.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C077FF8.AFBD8DB8@scali.no> <3C07E905.DF30E497@zip.com.au> <20011204003350.L2857@redhat.com> <3C0FB84A.76D8C003@scali.no> <20011206185027.O2029@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011206185027.O2029@redhat.com>; from sct@redhat.com on Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 06:50:27PM +0000
Hi Stephen.
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 06:50:27PM +0000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > So what could this be then ?
>
> > VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day...
>
> has been reported before, even on much more recent kernels, and even
> without ext3 loaded. So basically I've no idea what's behind it.
To quote my own post to xfs_devel and lk july 20th, subject
"Busy inodes after umount":
I've now been able to reproduce:
* make a filesystem
* mount it
* export it (nfs)
* mount on remote machine
* lock file (fcntl)
* unexport
* unmount
Then you get the VFS message about self-destruct. Tested with both ext2
and xfs.
A reply from Neil Brown:
Yep. It is not filesystem specific.
nfsd does not flush locks when a filesystem is un-exported, only when
a client is removed, and that actually never happens.
In fs/nfsd/lockd.c there is a comment:
/*
* When removing an NFS client entry, notify lockd that it is gone.
* FIXME: We should do the same when unexporting an NFS volume.
*/
That FIXME needs to be fixed. I need to read through some more code
before I am sure how to do it, but it shouldn't be too hard.
I hope that can be of some help?
--
Ragnar Kjørstad
Big Storage
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-06 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-30 12:47 2.4.9 kernel crash Steffen Persvold
2001-11-30 20:16 ` Andrew Morton
2001-12-03 19:10 ` [NFS] " Stephen Walton
2001-12-04 0:32 ` [Ext2-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-12-04 0:33 ` [Ext2-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-12-06 18:26 ` Steffen Persvold
2001-12-06 18:50 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-12-06 20:52 ` Ragnar Kjørstad [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011206215258.A30580@vestdata.no \
--to=nfs@ragnark.vestdata.no \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=sp@scali.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox