public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Niels Christiansen <nchr@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:46:13 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011209114613.GA5063@krispykreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF4AC865AC.00ED861C-ON85256B1C.0060D84F@raleigh.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF4AC865AC.00ED861C-ON85256B1C.0060D84F@raleigh.ibm.com>


> | > ...which may be true for 4-ways and even 8-ways but when you get to
> | > 32-ways and greater, you start seeing cache problems.  That was the
> | > case on AIX and per-cpu counters was one of the changes that helped
> | > get the spectacular scalability on Regatta.
> |
> | I agree there are large areas of improvement to be done wrt cacheline
> | ping ponging (see my patch in 2.4.17-pre6 for one example), but we
> | should do our own benchmarking and not look at what AIX has been doing.
> 
> Oh, please!  You voiced an opinion.  I presented facts.  Nobody suggested
> we should not measure on Linux.  As a matter of fact, I suggested that
> Kiran does tests on the real counters and he said he would.

Exactly, show me where the current problem is and I will benchmark it on
a 16 way linux/ppc64 machine. Your comments are opinions too unless
you have some figures to back them up :)

Anton

  reply	other threads:[~2001-12-09 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-08 17:43 [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Niels Christiansen
2001-12-09 11:46 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-09 10:57 Manfred Spraul
2001-12-10 16:32 ` Jack Steiner
2001-12-10 17:00   ` Manfred Spraul
2001-12-07  9:52 Niels Christiansen
2001-12-07 10:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-12-06 16:10 Niels Christiansen
2001-12-07  8:54 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-12-08 22:24   ` Paul Jackson
2001-12-09  3:46     ` Jack Steiner
2001-12-09  4:44       ` Paul Jackson
2001-12-09 17:34         ` Jack Steiner
2001-12-11 23:27           ` Paul Jackson
2001-12-07 11:39 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2001-12-08 13:46 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-12-05 15:02 Niels Christiansen
2001-12-06 12:33 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2001-12-06 13:07   ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-12-06 14:09     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2001-12-06 14:10       ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-12-06 19:35         ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-12-07 21:09     ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-12-07 21:16       ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011209114613.GA5063@krispykreme \
    --to=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=nchr@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox